COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-000001084
AMDFD837EWMHKBOX
▲ 56865 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q4 2024.

VS
▲ 532,563 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.3GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Effective Speed 
+103%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 5,734 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
95 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 131% Base clock 5.65 GHz, turbo 5.65 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 112% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 112% Great: 131%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
5,639 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 53% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 607th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		122 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+103% 		59.9 %
Average Score 
+231%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		91.8 Pts Lower memory latency.
+12% 		81.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		220 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+245% 		63.8 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		427 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+262% 		118 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		809 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+291% 		207 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1,481 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+346% 		332 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+200%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		98.7 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+8% 		91.3 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		229 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+202% 		75.9 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		458 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+223% 		142 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		892 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+255% 		251 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1,759 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+314% 		425 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+∞%
Market Share
Based on 68,992,026 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.85 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞% 		0 %
Value
Value For Money 		94.6 % Hugely better value.
+83% 		51.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		56 % Slightly more popular.
+6% 		53 %
Price
Price (score) 		$692 $471 Much cheaper.
+32%
Nice To Haves 
+372%
Age
Newest 		0+ Months Hugely more recent.
+100% 		122 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		2,358 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+454% 		426 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		2,229 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+563% 		336 Pts
Conclusion 
Average Bench 122%
Average Bench 59.9%

AMD’s 7800X3D and 9800X3D CPUs, priced over $400 USD, are widely marketed as “the best gaming CPUs in the world”. This is demonstrated at low resolutions with a 4090-class GPU, whilst conveniently ignoring 0.1% lows (frame drops). Under cherry-picked cache-bound conditions the X3D chips can excel, but there’s a trade-off: the additional cache results in 6% lower boost clocks and 50% to 80% higher prices than their regular counterparts (9700X and 7700X.) As with their Radeon GPUs, AMD is looking to drive demand through advanced marketing rather than delivering real-world performance. While Nvidia has effectively countered AMD’s marketing in the GPU space, Intel's marketers remain asleep (terminally?) at the wheel. Nevertheless, the 13600K and 14600K still deliver almost unparalleled real-world gaming performance for around $200 USD. Spending more on a gaming CPU is often pointless, as games are limited by the GPU in real-world scenarios. Without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). Since this summary was published just two days ago, hundreds of twitter threads, thousands of “pcmasterrace” reddit posts, multiple magazine articles, and several youtube videos have emerged in unanimous support for the $480 USD 9800X3D. All of these supposedly disinterested actors are working the weekend to convince you to pay their favourite billion-dollar brand an extra $280 USD this holiday season. [Nov '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX-8370E is an energy efficient Vishera eight core desktop processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. It was launched in September 2014 and is the energy efficient version of the FX-8370 boasting a lower TDP of 95 Watts versus 125 Watts on the FX-8370. Comparing the 8370E and 8370 shows that the lower TDP comes at a cost: the 8370E scores a relatively lacklustre effective speed of 73 compared to the non-E version which scores 83. The lower score is consistent with the relative clock speeds: 3.3 GHz on the 8370E versus 4.0 GHz on the 8370. Priced the same as the 8370, there is a direct choice between being green or speedy. Or, if you don’t really need the above average multi-threaded performance that the 8370E offers, then you may be better off with the superb single-threaded performance from any number of Intel’s offerings. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
95
5,639
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback