AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
AMDYD2600BBAFBOX

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

VS
About

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 344,392 user samples
152,826 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 73% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Poor: 73% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 1182
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
191,566 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 83% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 63% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 63% Great: 83%
SPEED RANK: 72nd / 1182
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
82.2 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+11%
74.4 %
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
119 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+8%
110 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
234 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+8%
216 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
462 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+10%
419 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
864 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+25%
692 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1291 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+43%
905 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
125 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+6%
118 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
248 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+5%
236 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
491 Pts +4% 470 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
955 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+21%
789 Pts
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1387 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+38%
1007 Pts
Market Share
Based on 19,520,808 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.85 % 2.99 % Much higher market share.
+62%
Value
Value For Money
86.1 % 91.1 % Slightly better value.
+6%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
128 % More popular.
+22%
105 %
Price
Price (score)
$235 $133 Much cheaper.
+43%
Age
Newest
16 Months 16 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm 12 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+9%
3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+10%
3.9 GHz
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by about 10%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers unbeatable value for money for workstation users. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for money, especially for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical gamers and desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX 580 $167Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback