AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
AMDYD2700BBAFBOX
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
200 EFps +1% 198 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
97 EFps +1% 96 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
129 EFps 135 EFps +5%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
115 EFps +2% 113 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
108 EFps 115 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+6%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 282,897 user samples
159,077 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 61% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 61% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 298th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
123,820 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 83% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 64% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 64% Great: 83%
SPEED RANK: 325th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
75.7 % +2% 73.8 %
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
6 % Hitm2 7%, FarC5 7%, StrangeB 0%, TWarW2 10%, SotTR 5%, ACO 6%, MetroEx 7%, MESoW 4%, Divis2 3%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
5 % FarC5 9%, BFV 7%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 0%, Witcher3 0%, Civ6 9%, ACO 3%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 9%, Wolf2 6%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
5 % FarC5 9%, BFV 7%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 0%, Witcher3 0%, Civ6 9%, ACO 3%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 9%, Wolf2 6%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
75.3 Pts 75.7 Pts +1%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
113 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+10%
103 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
219 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+8%
202 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
409 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+6%
387 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
708 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+6%
667 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
86.7 Pts +4% 83.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
128 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+8%
118 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
254 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+8%
236 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
499 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+10%
453 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
911 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+11%
823 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,712,926 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.25 % Hugely higher market share.
+108%
0.12 %
Value
Value For Money
81.7 % 82.6 % +1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % More popular.
+11%
63 %
Price
Price (score)
$210 $185 Cheaper.
+12%
Age
Newest
72 Months 72 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 16 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm 12 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+16%
3.2 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz +5% 4.1 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1276 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+9%
1176 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1096 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+8%
1017 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 7 2700 is an 8 core, 16 thread high-end desktop processor featuring AMD’s second generation 12nm Zen+ architecture and Precision Boost 2 technology. It is the second strongest of four new Ryzen CPUs due for imminent release. The second generation Ryzen processors, codenamed Pinnacle Ridge, are both compatible with the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Official specs for the 2700 are yet to be seen, but early benchmarks appear to indicate base and boost clock speeds of 3.2 and 4.1 GHz respectively. This translates to a modest improvement upon the previous generation 1700 which continues to offer fantastic value for money in terms of multi-core performance. The expected retail price of $299 includes a Wraith cooler and costs the same as Intel’s 6 core 12 thread i7-8700. As expected, the 8700 beats the 2700 on single and quad core intensive tasks, but lags slightly for higher core workloads. Even though the 2700 excels at pure multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames.  [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback