AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
AMDFD837EWMHKBOX

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.3GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 349,698 user samples
345,441 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 73% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 73% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 102nd / 1272
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
4,257 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 54% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 54% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 430th / 1272
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
82.6 % Much faster effective speed.
+31%
62.9 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
80.8 Pts 83.9 Pts +4%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
118 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+76%
67.2 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
232 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+83%
127 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
452 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+97%
229 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
826 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+118%
379 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
89.7 Pts 93.2 Pts +4%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
125 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+56%
80.3 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
247 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+64%
151 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
489 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+72%
284 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
951 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+95%
487 Pts
Market Share
Based on 34,474,522 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.63 % Insanely higher market share.
+16,200%
0.01 %
Value
Value For Money
88.9 % Better value.
+15%
77.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
126 % Hugely more popular.
+117%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$212 $130 Much cheaper.
+39%
Age
Newest
30 Months Much more recent.
+59%
73 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 95 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
+10%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+62%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+12%
3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz 4.3 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1375 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+177%
497 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1261 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+227%
386 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX-8370E is an energy efficient Vishera eight core desktop processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. It was launched in September 2014 and is the energy efficient version of the FX-8370 boasting a lower TDP of 95 Watts versus 125 Watts on the FX-8370. Comparing the 8370E and 8370 shows that the lower TDP comes at a cost: the 8370E scores a relatively lacklustre effective speed of 73 compared to the non-E version which scores 83. The lower score is consistent with the relative clock speeds: 3.3 GHz on the 8370E versus 4.0 GHz on the 8370. Priced the same as the 8370, there is a direct choice between being green or speedy. Or, if you don’t really need the above average multi-threaded performance that the 8370E offers, then you may be better off with the superb single-threaded performance from any number of Intel’s offerings. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2020 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback