AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
AMDFD832EWMHKBOX

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.2GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 130,560 user samples
111,378 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 88% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 88% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 31st / 1158
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
19,182 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 59% Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 37% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 37% Great: 59%
SPEED RANK: 384th / 1158
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
99.3 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+110%
47.3 %
SC Mixed
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
119 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+81%
65.9 Pts
QC Mixed
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
462 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+102%
229 Pts
MC Mixed
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1294 Pts Hugely faster multi-core speed.
+232%
390 Pts
SC Mixed
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
126 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+60%
78.7 Pts
QC Mixed
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
493 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+68%
293 Pts
MC Mixed
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1393 Pts Hugely faster OC multi-core speed.
+172%
512 Pts
Market Share
Based on 17,143,379 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.37 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,055%
0.11 %
Value
Value For Money
101 % Much better value.
+34%
75.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
143 % Hugely more popular.
+138%
60 %
Price
Price (score)
$280 $85 Much cheaper.
+70%
Age
Newest
13 Months Much more recent.
+77%
56 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 95 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
+10%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+62%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+16%
3.2 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+8%
4 GHz
SC Int
Single Core Integer Speed
122 Pts Much faster single-core int speed.
+46%
83.8 Pts
SC Float
Single Core Floating Point Speed
131 Pts Much faster single-core fp speed.
+75%
75 Pts
QC Int
Quad Core Integer Speed
474 Pts Much faster quad-core int speed.
+52%
311 Pts
QC Float
Quad Core Floating Point Speed
513 Pts Hugely faster quad-core fp speed.
+89%
271 Pts
MC Int
Multi Core Integer Speed
1347 Pts Hugely faster multi-core int speed.
+156%
527 Pts
MC Float
Multi Core Floating Point Speed
1402 Pts Hugely faster multi-core fp speed.
+212%
449 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by about 10%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by four or less cores but the 2700X offers unbeatable value for money for workstation users. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX-8320E is a Vishera eight core processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. The ‘E’ in the FX-8320E denotes energy efficiency with the FX-8320E boasting a TDP of 95 Watts which is relatively low for FX processors. The FX-8320E was launched in September 2014 at the same time as the FX-8370E. Comparing the 8370E and 8320E shows that the performance profiles are similar with the 25% more expensive 8370E edging ahead, particularly on single core workloads. The 8370E is clocked slightly higher with base/turbo frequencies of 3.3/4.3 GHz versus the 8320E’s 3.2/4.0 GHz. Overall the 8320E scores a mediocre effective speed of 70. Whilst this is sufficient for the majority of desktop applications: web-surfing, word-processing and playing movies, better single-core performance is offered by any number of Intel processors. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $355Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $92
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $601SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback