UserBenchmark: AMD FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 2600

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMDYD2600BBAFBOX

BUY • $125

AMDFD837EWMHKBOX

BUY • $471

BenchYourCPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 185,227 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

179,588 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 81% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 67% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)

Poor: 67% Great: 81%

SPEED RANK: 331^st / 1442

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

5,639 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 66% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 53% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)

Poor: 53% Great: 66%

SPEED RANK: 583^rd / 1442

Gaming 60%

Gunboat

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 46%

Yacht


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		73.3 %	Faster effective speed. +22%		59.9 %


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	76.6 Pts		81.7 Pts	Slightly lower memory latency. +7%
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	108 Pts	Much faster single-core speed. +69%	63.8 Pts
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	210 Pts	Much faster dual-core speed. +78%	118 Pts
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	377 Pts	Hugely faster quad-core speed. +82%	207 Pts
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	621 Pts	Hugely faster octa-core speed. +87%	332 Pts


Memory OC Memory Latency	83.8 Pts		91.3 Pts	Slightly lower OC memory latency. +9%
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	118 Pts	Much faster OC single-core speed. +55%	75.9 Pts
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	232 Pts	Much faster OC dual-core speed. +63%	142 Pts
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	446 Pts	Much faster OC quad-core speed. +78%	251 Pts
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	676 Pts	Much faster OC octa-core speed. +59%	425 Pts

Market Share

Based on 67,712,080 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.42 %	Insanely higher market share. +∞%	0 %
Value Value For Money	91.3 %	Much better value. +76%	51.8 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	76 %	Much more popular. +46%	52 %
Price Price (score)	$125	Much cheaper. +73%	$471


Age Newest	72 Months	Much more recent. +37%	115 Months
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watts	Much more energy efficient. +32%	95 Watts
Cores CPU Processing Cores	6 cores		8 cores	Much higher core count. +33%
Threads CPU Processing Threads	12 threads	Much higher thread count. +50%	8 threads
Lithography Manufacturing process	12 nm	Much newer manufacturing. +62%	32 nm
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	3.4 GHz	+3%	3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	3.9 GHz		4.3 GHz	Faster turbo frequency. +10%
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	889 Pts	Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +109%	426 Pts
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	800 Pts	Hugely faster 64-core speed. +138%	336 Pts


Series CPU Architecture	Zen+	Piledriver
Socket Motherboard Socket	AM4	AM3+
Graphics Integrated Graphics	None	None

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. Even though the 2600 is plausible for multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. ^{[Apr '18 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The FX-8370E is an energy efficient Vishera eight core desktop processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. It was launched in September 2014 and is the energy efficient version of the FX-8370 boasting a lower TDP of 95 Watts versus 125 Watts on the FX-8370. Comparing the 8370E and 8370 shows that the lower TDP comes at a cost: the 8370E scores a relatively lacklustre effective speed of 73 compared to the non-E version which scores 83. The lower score is consistent with the relative clock speeds: 3.3 GHz on the 8370E versus 4.0 GHz on the 8370. Priced the same as the 8370, there is a direct choice between being green or speedy. Or, if you don’t really need the above average multi-threaded performance that the 8370E offers, then you may be better off with the superb single-threaded performance from any number of Intel’s offerings. ^{[Dec '14 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback