UserBenchmark: AMD FX-8370E vs Ryzen 7 2700

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMDYD2700BBAFBOX

BUY • $185

AMDFD837EWMHKBOX

BUY • $471

BenchYourCPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 129,459 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

123,820 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 83% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 64% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)

Poor: 64% Great: 83%

SPEED RANK: 325^th / 1442

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 71%

Battleship

5,639 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 66% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 53% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)

Poor: 53% Great: 66%

SPEED RANK: 583^rd / 1442

Gaming 60%

Gunboat

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 46%

Yacht


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		73.8 %	Faster effective speed. +23%		59.9 %


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	75.7 Pts		81.7 Pts	Slightly lower memory latency. +8%
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	103 Pts	Much faster single-core speed. +61%	63.8 Pts
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	202 Pts	Much faster dual-core speed. +71%	118 Pts
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	387 Pts	Hugely faster quad-core speed. +87%	207 Pts
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	667 Pts	Hugely faster octa-core speed. +101%	332 Pts


Memory OC Memory Latency	83.7 Pts		91.3 Pts	Slightly lower OC memory latency. +9%
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	118 Pts	Much faster OC single-core speed. +55%	75.9 Pts
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	236 Pts	Much faster OC dual-core speed. +66%	142 Pts
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	453 Pts	Hugely faster OC quad-core speed. +80%	251 Pts
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	823 Pts	Hugely faster OC octa-core speed. +94%	425 Pts

Market Share

Based on 67,699,025 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.11 %	Insanely higher market share. +∞%	0 %
Value Value For Money	82.6 %	Much better value. +60%	51.8 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	63 %	More popular. +21%	52 %
Price Price (score)	$185	Much cheaper. +61%	$471


Age Newest	71 Months	Much more recent. +38%	115 Months
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watts	Much more energy efficient. +32%	95 Watts
Cores CPU Processing Cores	8 cores		8 cores
Threads CPU Processing Threads	16 threads	Hugely higher thread count. +100%	8 threads
Lithography Manufacturing process	12 nm	Much newer manufacturing. +62%	32 nm
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	3.2 GHz		3.3 GHz	+3%
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	4.1 GHz		4.3 GHz	+5%
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	1176 Pts	Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +176%	426 Pts
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	1017 Pts	Hugely faster 64-core speed. +203%	336 Pts


Series CPU Architecture	Zen+	Piledriver
Socket Motherboard Socket	AM4	AM3+
Graphics Integrated Graphics	None	None

The Ryzen 7 2700 is an 8 core, 16 thread high-end desktop processor featuring AMD’s second generation 12nm Zen+ architecture and Precision Boost 2 technology. It is the second strongest of four new Ryzen CPUs due for imminent release. The second generation Ryzen processors, codenamed Pinnacle Ridge, are both compatible with the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Official specs for the 2700 are yet to be seen, but early benchmarks appear to indicate base and boost clock speeds of 3.2 and 4.1 GHz respectively. This translates to a modest improvement upon the previous generation 1700 which continues to offer fantastic value for money in terms of multi-core performance. The expected retail price of $299 includes a Wraith cooler and costs the same as Intel’s 6 core 12 thread i7-8700. As expected, the 8700 beats the 2700 on single and quad core intensive tasks, but lags slightly for higher core workloads. Even though the 2700 excels at pure multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. ^{[Apr '18 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The FX-8370E is an energy efficient Vishera eight core desktop processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. It was launched in September 2014 and is the energy efficient version of the FX-8370 boasting a lower TDP of 95 Watts versus 125 Watts on the FX-8370. Comparing the 8370E and 8370 shows that the lower TDP comes at a cost: the 8370E scores a relatively lacklustre effective speed of 73 compared to the non-E version which scores 83. The lower score is consistent with the relative clock speeds: 3.3 GHz on the 8370E versus 4.0 GHz on the 8370. Priced the same as the 8370, there is a direct choice between being green or speedy. Or, if you don’t really need the above average multi-threaded performance that the 8370E offers, then you may be better off with the superb single-threaded performance from any number of Intel’s offerings. ^{[Dec '14 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback