COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMDYD2700BBAFBOX
AMD100-100000065BOX
▲ 623,777 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.2GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

VS
▲ 9414,744 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen3.
Release date: Q4 2020.

Game EFps  
+16%
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max 		198 EFps 310 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+57%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 		96 EFps 101 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+5%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 		135 EFps +1% 134 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max 		113 EFps 131 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+16%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 		115 EFps 120 EFps +4%
Effective Speed 
+30%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 507,240 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
123,820 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 83% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 64% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 64% Great: 83%
SPEED RANK: 344th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
383,420 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 107% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 83% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 83% Great: 107%
SPEED RANK: 123rd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		73.8 % 95.9 % Faster effective speed.
+30%
External Data: 1080p 
+40%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review 		20 % FarC5 50%, BFV 26%, SotTR 5%, Rage2 4%, Witcher3 5%, Civ6 31%, ACO 5%, MetroEx 16%, Sekiro 45%, Wolf2 16%
22 Nov22|Gamers Nexus
Intel i7-13700K CPU Review & Bench... 		61 % FinFant14 41%, GTAV 53%, SotTR 65%, CSGO 99%, R6S 71%, TWarW3 34%
Average Score 
+41%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		75.7 Pts 84 Pts Lower memory latency.
+11%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		103 Pts 162 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+57%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		202 Pts 315 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+56%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		387 Pts 580 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+50%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		667 Pts 883 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+32%
Overclocked Score 
+34%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		83.7 Pts 93.8 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+12%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		118 Pts 172 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+46%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		236 Pts 342 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+45%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		453 Pts 667 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+47%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		823 Pts 989 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+20%
Value & Sentiment 
+303%
Market Share
Based on 69,051,733 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.09 % 1.05 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,067%
Value
Value For Money 		83.2 % 125 % Much better value.
+51%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		62 % 94 % Much more popular.
+52%
Price
Price (score) 		$180 $105 Much cheaper.
+42%
Nice To Haves 
+5%
Age
Newest 		79 Months 48 Months Much more recent.
+39%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		65 Watts 65 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		8 cores Much higher core count.
+33% 		6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33% 		12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		12 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+42%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.2 GHz 3.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+16%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.1 GHz 4.6 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+12%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1,176 Pts +1% 1,160 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1,017 Pts 1,055 Pts +4%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Zen+ Zen3
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 73.8%
Average Bench 95.9%

The Ryzen 7 2700 is an 8 core, 16 thread high-end desktop processor featuring AMD’s second generation 12nm Zen+ architecture and Precision Boost 2 technology. It is the second strongest of four new Ryzen CPUs due for imminent release. The second generation Ryzen processors, codenamed Pinnacle Ridge, are both compatible with the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Official specs for the 2700 are yet to be seen, but early benchmarks appear to indicate base and boost clock speeds of 3.2 and 4.1 GHz respectively. This translates to a modest improvement upon the previous generation 1700 which continues to offer fantastic value for money in terms of multi-core performance. The expected retail price of $299 includes a Wraith cooler and costs the same as Intel’s 6 core 12 thread i7-8700. As expected, the 8700 beats the 2700 on single and quad core intensive tasks, but lags slightly for higher core workloads. Even though the 2700 excels at pure multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames.  [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 5 5600X is both the entry-level and best value for money 5000 series CPU. The 5600X is a hex-core 12 thread processor with a base clock speed of 3.7 GHz boosting to 4.6 GHz. It has 35 MB of cache and a TDP rating of 65W. A cooler is included in the MSRP of $300 USD, but cheap after-market coolers (such as the $20 GAMMAXX 400) are far more effective and therefore worth the upgrade. Notably, AMD’s new Zen 3 architecture has vastly improved single-core performance and lower memory latency, which leads to a significant effective speed advantage over its predecessor, the 3600X. Last year, AMD’s class-leading marketers secured significant sales of the 3000 series CPUs despite a 15% performance deficit against lower priced Intel parts. The games, specific scenes, software/hardware settings and choice of competing hardware were often cherry picked, undisclosed and inconsistent from one product to the next. Now that AMD have actually achieved both top tier performance and market share, their marketing machinery is focused on price hikes. Users that do not wish to pay a marketing premium should investigate Intel’s 11400F, which, when paired with a 2060 Super, delivers higher EFps in four out of five of today’s most popular games, at half the MSRP. Allocating the savings to a higher tier GPU will result in a far superior gaming PC. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
123,820
383,420
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback