AMDYD2700BBAFBOX
AMD100-100000059WOF
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
198 EFps 318 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+61%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
96 EFps 108 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+12%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
135 EFps 142 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+5%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
113 EFps 133 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+18%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
115 EFps 121 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+5%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 156,846 user samples
123,820 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 83% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 64% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 64% Great: 83%
SPEED RANK: 325th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
33,026 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 68th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
73.8 % 100 % Much faster effective speed.
+36%
22 Nov22|Gamers Nexus
Intel i7-13700K CPU Review & Bench...
69 % FarC6 65%, FinFant14 39%, GTAV 68%, SotTR 80%, CSGO 111%, R6S 86%, TWarW3 35%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
75.7 Pts 81 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
103 Pts 164 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+59%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
202 Pts 326 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+61%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
387 Pts 639 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+65%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
667 Pts 1232 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+85%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
83.7 Pts 92.7 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
118 Pts 180 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+53%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
236 Pts 355 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+50%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
453 Pts 697 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+54%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
823 Pts 1376 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+67%
Market Share
Based on 67,720,883 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.13 % 0.22 % Much higher market share.
+69%
Value
Value For Money
82.6 % 89.7 % Slightly better value.
+9%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
63 % 69 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
Price
Price (score)
$185 Much cheaper.
+56%
$416
Age
Newest
72 Months 41 Months Much more recent.
+43%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+42%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.2 GHz 3.4 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+6%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.1 GHz 4.9 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+20%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1176 Pts 3063 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+160%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1017 Pts 2633 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+159%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Zen3
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ryzen 7 2700 is an 8 core, 16 thread high-end desktop processor featuring AMD’s second generation 12nm Zen+ architecture and Precision Boost 2 technology. It is the second strongest of four new Ryzen CPUs due for imminent release. The second generation Ryzen processors, codenamed Pinnacle Ridge, are both compatible with the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Official specs for the 2700 are yet to be seen, but early benchmarks appear to indicate base and boost clock speeds of 3.2 and 4.1 GHz respectively. This translates to a modest improvement upon the previous generation 1700 which continues to offer fantastic value for money in terms of multi-core performance. The expected retail price of $299 includes a Wraith cooler and costs the same as Intel’s 6 core 12 thread i7-8700. As expected, the 8700 beats the 2700 on single and quad core intensive tasks, but lags slightly for higher core workloads. Even though the 2700 excels at pure multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames.  [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen 9 5950X is an impressive workhorse. It sits at the top of AMD’s latest Zen 3 based, 5000 series of CPUs and sends a clear message that AMD can beat Intel in terms of raw performance and core count. The 5950X has a boost clock speed of up to 4.9 GHz, a massive 72 MB cache and a TDP rating of 105W. Despite the “gaming” focus of AMD’s 5000 series launch marketing, the 5950X does not efficiently leverage all its 16 cores in gaming (as demonstrated by similar effective speed scores compared to the 12-core 5900X, 8-core 5800X and 6-core 5600X.) 16 cores are only suitable for professional use cases that have CPU processing needs which cannot be more efficiently met by a GPU or other dedicated hardware. There is no Intel equivalent with this number of cores, and the 5950X’s uniqueness is reflected in its $799 USD price tag, 45% more expensive than the 5900X. Gamers will get far higher FPS per dollar by allocating a higher proportion of their budget towards a better GPU rather than blowing $799 USD on the 5950X. Professional users that plan to use 32 concurrent threads at 100% load will find value in the 5950X. On the other hand, workstation users that rarely exceed 20 concurrent threads at 100% should consider the 10850K for around half the money. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback