COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMDYD1700BBAEBOX
IntelBX80646I74770K
▲ 6913,316 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.0GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q1 2017.

VS
▲ 6513,778 ▼

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.5GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q1 2013.

Effective Speed 
+7%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 317,362 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
144,475 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 431st / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
172,887 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 84% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 60% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
Poor: 60% Great: 84%
SPEED RANK: 335th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		69 % 73.6 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
External Data: 1080p 
+9%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review 		9 % Hitm2 9%, FarC5 10%, StrangeB 2%, TWarW2 8%, SotTR 8%, ACO 25%, MESoW 6%, Divis2 20% MetroEx 3%
Average Score 
+2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		70 Pts 85.6 Pts Lower memory latency.
+22%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		96.7 Pts 101 Pts +4%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		190 Pts 192 Pts +1%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		366 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+10% 		334 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		640 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+29% 		497 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+4%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		78.8 Pts 96 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+22%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		116 Pts 122 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+5%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		233 Pts +0% 232 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		456 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+13% 		403 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		798 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+31% 		609 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+101%
Market Share
Based on 68,124,867 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.06 % 0.27 % Hugely higher market share.
+350%
Value
Value For Money 		76.1 % 92.7 % Better value.
+22%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		69 % Slightly more popular.
+6% 		65 %
Price
Price (score) 		$195 $120 Much cheaper.
+38%
Nice To Haves 
+50%
Age
Newest 		87 Months Much more recent.
+36% 		135 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		65 Watts More energy efficient.
+23% 		84 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100% 		4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100% 		8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+36% 		22 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3 GHz 3.5 GHz Faster base frequency.
+17%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3.7 GHz 3.9 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+5%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1178 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+90% 		620 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		980 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+91% 		513 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Zen Haswell
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM4 FCLGA1150
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None HD 4600
Conclusion 
Average Bench 69%
Average Bench 73.6%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is the least powerful of three new Ryzen 7 CPUs. The 1700 model has base and turbo clocks of 3.0 and 3.7 GHz respectively. Both of its more expensive siblings, the 1700X and 1800X, have higher clocks but they also have TDPs of 95 watts whereas the 1700 is rated at just 65 watts. Comparing IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake shows that Kaby Lake leads by a maximum of 9% which is great news for workstation users as this allows the 1700 to beat Intel's 6850K in multi-core workloads at almost half the price. Although the 1700 has great IPC it's somewhat limited by its relatively low (by Kaby Lake standards) clock speed which holds it back a little in both gaming and desktop workloads. For multi-core workstation use, the Ryzen 7 1700 represents the best value for money we have ever seen. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Core i7-4770K is Intel's fourth generation (codename Haswell) flagship processor in the hugely successful Core range. It's not surprising that the 4770K sets a new Real World Performance index record, besting its predecessor by just over 9%. The 4770K also tops out in the remainder of our benchmarks setting new highs of 10020 and 2164 in the PassMark and PassMark Single Thread tests which equates to roughly an 8% overall performance increase over the 3770K. With a TDP of 84 watts, power consumption has increased slightly over the 3770K. The new Core i7-4770K demonstrates around an 8% performance increase over its predecessor the 3770K but it costs 12% more. As a result, at least until prices drop, this processor represents marginally worse value for money than the 3770K. [Jun '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
144,475
172,887
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback