AMD100-100000593WOF
AMDHDE00ZFBGRBOX

6 Cores, 12 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.3GHz, K10.
Release date: Q4 2010.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 19,080 user samples
6,311 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 120% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 101% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 120%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
12,769 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 51% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 51% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 600th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
110 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+88%
58.6 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81.7 Pts +1% 81 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
202 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+279%
53.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
392 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+270%
106 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
746 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+273%
200 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1166 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+315%
281 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.2 Pts 92 Pts +1%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
213 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+265%
58.4 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
419 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+258%
117 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
821 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+252%
233 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1254 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+268%
341 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,809,955 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.31 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
122 % Hugely better value.
+120%
55.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
82 % Much more popular.
+52%
54 %
Price
Price (score)
$195 Much cheaper.
+43%
$340
Age
Newest
19 Months Hugely more recent.
+88%
161 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts More energy efficient.
+16%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
6 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
5 nm Hugely newer manufacturing.
+89%
45 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4.7 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+42%
3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.3 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+43%
3.7 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1504 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+336%
345 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1429 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+401%
285 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen4 K10
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM5 AM3
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
RDNA2 None
ADVERTISEMENT

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Phenom II X6 1100T was the last, in a long line of Phenom II X6's. The series went 1045T, 1055T, 1065T, 1075T, 1090T and finally 1100T. Each successive release was clocked slightly higher ending with the 1100T which had a base/turbo clock speed of 3.3/3.7 GHz. The X6 has six processing cores and demonstrates very good multi-core performance but it is less able to handle single and dual core workloads, which is what the majority of consumer desktop computing requires. The X6 series were good overclockers with the ability to boost stock clocks by around 20%. Comparing the 1100T to the similarly priced i5-2400 shows that Intel's mid-range Sandy Bridge processor, which was released just a month after the 1100T, was around 8% faster for single and dual core workloads but slower by a staggering 30% for multi-core workloads. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback