IntelBX80623I52400
AMDHDE00ZFBGRBOX

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.1GHz, Sandy Bridge.
Release date: Q1 2011.

VS
About

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.3GHz, K10.
Release date: Q4 2010.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 87,831 user samples
78,215 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 59% Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 40% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 40% Great: 59%
SPEED RANK: 301st / 1197
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
9,616 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 49% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 37% Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 37% Great: 49%
SPEED RANK: 438th / 1197
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
54.5 % Faster effective speed.
+25%
43.5 %
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
83.1 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+28%
64.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
163 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+27%
128 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
304 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+26%
242 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
308 Pts 346 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+12%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
311 Pts 351 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+13%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
88.9 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+26%
70.8 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
173 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+23%
141 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
337 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+20%
282 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
338 Pts 409 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+21%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
339 Pts 415 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+22%
Market Share
Based on 21,719,163 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.59 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,375%
0.04 %
Value
Value For Money
77.3 % Hugely better value.
+88%
41.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
74 % More popular.
+23%
60 %
Price
Price (score)
$78 Much cheaper.
+77%
$340
Age
Newest
106 Months +1% 107 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts More energy efficient.
+24%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores 6 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 6 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm Newer manufacturing.
+29%
45 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.1 GHz 3.3 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+6%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.4 GHz 3.7 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+9%
Series
CPU Architecture
Sandy Bridge K10
Socket
Motherboard Socket
LGA1155 AM3
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
HD 2000 None
ADVERTISEMENT

Pros: Brilliant value for money. Cons: It's not the 2400k which can be had for just a tiny bit more and offers a lot more flexibility in terms of overclocking. [Apr '12 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Phenom II X6 1100T was the last, in a long line of Phenom II X6's. The series went 1045T, 1055T, 1065T, 1075T, 1090T and finally 1100T. Each successive release was clocked slightly higher ending with the 1100T which had a base/turbo clock speed of 3.3/3.7 GHz. The X6 has six processing cores and demonstrates very good multi-core performance but it is less able to handle single and dual core workloads, which is what the majority of consumer desktop computing requires. The X6 series were good overclockers with the ability to boost stock clocks by around 20%. Comparing the 1100T to the similarly priced i5-2400 shows that Intel's mid-range Sandy Bridge processor, which was released just a month after the 1100T, was around 8% faster for single and dual core workloads but slower by a staggering 30% for multi-core workloads. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical gamers and desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $209Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback