AMDYD2600BBAFBOX
AMDHDE00ZFBGRBOX
VS
About

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.3GHz, K10.
Release date: Q4 2010.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 269,845 user samples
260,103 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 83% Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 67% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 67% Great: 83%
SPEED RANK: 84th / 1206
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
9,742 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 49% Base clock 4.1 GHz
Worst Bench: 37% Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 37% Great: 49%
SPEED RANK: 451st / 1206
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
75.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+75%
43.3 %
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
112 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+74%
64.4 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
220 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+72%
128 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
424 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+76%
241 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
701 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+103%
345 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
120 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+70%
70.4 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
240 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+71%
140 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
472 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+69%
279 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
793 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+94%
408 Pts
Market Share
Based on 22,641,434 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.99 % Insanely higher market share.
+9,867%
0.03 %
Value
Value For Money
95.7 % Hugely better value.
+133%
41 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
140 % Hugely more popular.
+130%
61 %
Price
Price (score)
$120 Much cheaper.
+65%
$340
Age
Newest
19 Months Hugely more recent.
+82%
108 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+48%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
6 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+73%
45 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz +3% 3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.9 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+5%
3.7 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1011 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+145%
412 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
914 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+162%
349 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ K10
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM3
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. Even though the 2600 is plausible for pure multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Phenom II X6 1100T was the last, in a long line of Phenom II X6's. The series went 1045T, 1055T, 1065T, 1075T, 1090T and finally 1100T. Each successive release was clocked slightly higher ending with the 1100T which had a base/turbo clock speed of 3.3/3.7 GHz. The X6 has six processing cores and demonstrates very good multi-core performance but it is less able to handle single and dual core workloads, which is what the majority of consumer desktop computing requires. The X6 series were good overclockers with the ability to boost stock clocks by around 20%. Comparing the 1100T to the similarly priced i5-2400 shows that Intel's mid-range Sandy Bridge processor, which was released just a month after the 1100T, was around 8% faster for single and dual core workloads but slower by a staggering 30% for multi-core workloads. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical gamers and desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback