AMDYD2600BBAFBOX
AMDHDE00ZFBGRBOX
VS
About

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.3GHz, K10.
Release date: Q4 2010.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 235,430 user samples
226,420 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 83% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 63% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg)
Poor: 63% Great: 83%
SPEED RANK: 68th / 1184
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
9,010 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 50% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 35% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 35% Great: 50%
SPEED RANK: 354th / 1184
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
74.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+76%
42.4 %
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
110 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+70%
64.6 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
218 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+70%
128 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
422 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+75%
241 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
696 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+101%
346 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
907 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+158%
351 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
118 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+66%
71.2 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
236 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+66%
142 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
471 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+66%
283 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
783 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+87%
419 Pts
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1004 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+140%
418 Pts
Market Share
Based on 21,111,615 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3 % Insanely higher market share.
+7,400%
0.04 %
Value
Value For Money
96.6 % Hugely better value.
+141%
40.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
144 % Hugely more popular.
+140%
60 %
Price
Price (score)
$110 Much cheaper.
+68%
$340
Age
Newest
18 Months Hugely more recent.
+83%
106 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+48%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
6 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+73%
45 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz +3% 3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.9 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+5%
3.7 GHz
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ K10
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM3
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Phenom II X6 1100T was the last, in a long line of Phenom II X6's. The series went 1045T, 1055T, 1065T, 1075T, 1090T and finally 1100T. Each successive release was clocked slightly higher ending with the 1100T which had a base/turbo clock speed of 3.3/3.7 GHz. The X6 has six processing cores and demonstrates very good multi-core performance but it is less able to handle single and dual core workloads, which is what the majority of consumer desktop computing requires. The X6 series were good overclockers with the ability to boost stock clocks by around 20%. Comparing the 1100T to the similarly priced i5-2400 shows that Intel's mid-range Sandy Bridge processor, which was released just a month after the 1100T, was around 8% faster for single and dual core workloads but slower by a staggering 30% for multi-core workloads. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical gamers and desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback