AMDYD2700BBAFBOX
AMDHDE00ZFBGRBOX

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.3GHz, K10.
Release date: Q4 2010.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 120,841 user samples
109,230 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 66% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 66% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 196th / 1276
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
11,611 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 56% Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 56% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 421st / 1276
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
75.7 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
63.4 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
77.9 Pts 82.5 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
104 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+60%
65 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
203 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+59%
128 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
395 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+63%
242 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
717 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+107%
347 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
86.2 Pts 91.9 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
119 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+69%
70.4 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
234 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+67%
140 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
467 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+69%
276 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
876 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+116%
406 Pts
Market Share
Based on 36,344,931 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.51 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,450%
0.02 %
Value
Value For Money
74.6 % Better value.
+24%
60 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % Much more popular.
+51%
65 %
Price
Price (score)
$293 Cheaper.
+14%
$340
Age
Newest
31 Months Much more recent.
+74%
120 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+48%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+167%
6 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+73%
45 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.2 GHz 3.3 GHz +3%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.1 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+11%
3.7 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1314 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+224%
406 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1103 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+217%
348 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ K10
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM3
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ryzen 7 2700 is an 8 core, 16 thread high-end desktop processor featuring AMD’s second generation 12nm Zen+ architecture and Precision Boost 2 technology. It is the second strongest of four new Ryzen CPUs due for imminent release. The second generation Ryzen processors, codenamed Pinnacle Ridge, are both compatible with the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Official specs for the 2700 are yet to be seen, but early benchmarks appear to indicate base and boost clock speeds of 3.2 and 4.1 GHz respectively. This translates to a modest improvement upon the previous generation 1700 which continues to offer fantastic value for money in terms of multi-core performance. The expected retail price of $299 includes a Wraith cooler and costs the same as Intel’s 6 core 12 thread i7-8700. As expected, the 8700 beats the 2700 on single and quad core intensive tasks, but lags slightly for higher core workloads. Even though the 2700 excels at pure multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames.  [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Phenom II X6 1100T was the last, in a long line of Phenom II X6's. The series went 1045T, 1055T, 1065T, 1075T, 1090T and finally 1100T. Each successive release was clocked slightly higher ending with the 1100T which had a base/turbo clock speed of 3.3/3.7 GHz. The X6 has six processing cores and demonstrates very good multi-core performance but it is less able to handle single and dual core workloads, which is what the majority of consumer desktop computing requires. The X6 series were good overclockers with the ability to boost stock clocks by around 20%. Comparing the 1100T to the similarly priced i5-2400 shows that Intel's mid-range Sandy Bridge processor, which was released just a month after the 1100T, was around 8% faster for single and dual core workloads but slower by a staggering 30% for multi-core workloads. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2020 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $250Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $181
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback