AMDFD4350FRHKBOX
AMDFD6300WMHKBOX

4 Cores, 4 Threads @4.2GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q2 2013.

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.5GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 273,602 user samples
11,995 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 45% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Poor: 45% Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 641st / 1451
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
261,607 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 44% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 44% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 686th / 1451
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
57.3 % +4% 55.2 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
82.1 Pts +4% 79.2 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
67.6 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+19%
56.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
122 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+17%
104 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
190 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+8%
176 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
194 Pts 217 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+12%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92 Pts +3% 89 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
78.6 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+15%
68.5 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
145 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+17%
124 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
225 Pts +5% 215 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
225 Pts 265 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+18%
Market Share
Based on 68,073,223 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.12 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
94.5 % Better value.
+26%
75.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 57 % More popular.
+12%
Price
Price (score)
$45 Much cheaper.
+50%
$90
Age
Newest
133 Months +5% 140 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts 95 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores 6 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 6 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm 32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4.2 GHz Faster base frequency.
+20%
3.5 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz +5% 4.1 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
227 Pts 275 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+21%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
195 Pts 226 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+16%
Series
CPU Architecture
Piledriver Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM3+ AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD FX-4350 is a value quad-core processor. It was released in Q2 of 2013 and is a refreshed version of the Piledriver based FX-4300. Its base clock speed of 4.2 GHz boosts to 4.3 GHz in turbo mode and since it is unlocked, the FX-4350 can be overclocked to over 4.6 GHz. Its effective speed of 71 is reasonable for general computing and even gaming when coupled with an adequate GPU. Whilst the FX-4350 is cheap, it’s not so differently priced from the hexa core FX-6350 which was launched concurrently and offers slightly better multi-core performance. So if you like to game and Skype at the same time, then it may be worth considering an upgrade but since most general computing only relies on single-core performance, the upgrade is probably not worth it. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX 6-Core, like most CPUs from AMD, delivers reasonably good server orientated multi threaded performance and consequently good processing thoughput at a reasonable price tag. Where the FX 6-Core lacks is in the area of single core performance which although not normally a major problem for server workloads, is always very relevant to desktop users. The overall performance of the FX 6-Core is comparable to Intel's five years younger Core i7-950. There are server orientated use cases where the FX 6-Core will excel thanks to its excellent overall throughput and in those instances the FX 6-Core represents good value for money. But typical desktop users will find far better value elsewhere[Sep '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback