Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime174.8 Days
Run DateApr 30 '22 at 14:08
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4350-$45
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.2% Average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 13.8
2-Core 86.3
41% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 41.6
8-Core 76
7% 58.8 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
MSI(1462 2381) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 21.7
Parallax 4.9
13% 14.1 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 14.9
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$95
756GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 197 163 177 243 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 287
Write 287
Mixed 286
SusWrite 194
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 33.1
103% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 39.8
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 50.3
41% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 137%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$53
500GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 125 113 121 134 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 140
Write 154
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 122
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
575GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 87 90 93 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 83.7
Write 89
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 89.7
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 57%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$35
925GB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 125 114 118 135 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 168
Write 154
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 122
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 13.5
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.6
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback