Average Bench: 53.5% (727th of 1468)

Based on 44,863 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00600F12 Model: AMD FX(tm)-6100 Six-Core Processor

The AMD FX-6100 has six processing cores, which is above average for a desktop CPU. Single and dual core performance is weak scoring amongst the bottom 30% of desktop processors. Multi core performance is better but still barely above the bottom 10% of processors. At nearly three years of age, the FX-6100 struggles to compete with more recent CPUs. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

Poor: 41%Average: 53.5% Great: 60%
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Average average bench

The AMD FX-6100 averaged 46.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 76.8Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 55.7Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD FX-6100 is just 19.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD FX-6100 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 219Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 215Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 44,863 samples)
Min Avg Max
63.8 Memory 76.8 84
32.1 1-Core 55.7 67.3
67.8 2-Core 101 124
49.7% 77.9 Pts
Min Avg Max
105 4-Core 171 211
132 8-Core 215 269
24.7% 193 Pts
Min Avg Max
137 64-Core 219 269
13.6% 219 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Memory 83.7
1-Core 60
2-Core 103
53% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 242
28% 220 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Memory 81
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 112
52% 82.7 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 244
28% 219 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Memory 80.4
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 103
52% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 240
26% 208 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 77
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 107
48% 77 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 246
25% 200 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
44,863 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 69,049,505 CPUs tested

 Prices

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

MSRP ≈ $129 @ launch in Oct '11
AmazonUS $6816 mins
Send price feedback
Typical FX-6100 Builds (Compare 1,379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX3 - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $299

Popular FX-6100 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Take your PC’s megatasking abilities to extreme levels...

Added 10 years ago.

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

17 days ago.

Have owned it since new but it is just slow and takes awhile to get going again. Wish I had gone to Intel


Terrible

21 months ago.

absolute garbage there's cheaper and better options


Good

3 years ago.

super fast, overclockeable, big core very big six


Terrible

4 years ago.

freezes alot in windows apertly a proplem you cant fix


Terrible

10 years ago.


Very good

8 years ago.

Процессор хороший!


Good

4 years ago.

Bien pour des tâches moyennes comme le 4300 il tient bien la réputation des FX : Ils chauffent beaucoup trop. Malgré tout le processeur a une bonne fréquence mais n'est pas très bien optimisé.


Excellent

7 years ago.

Epically powerful for how old it is. :D


Very good

9 years ago.

Does all the basics, and seems to overclock well. I like it.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Excellent performance, overclocking compatibility. Running it for 1 year, 24/7 @ 4,5GHz with no problems.


Your
opinion?
1468 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback