Today's hottest deals
AMDFD6100WMGUSBX
IntelBX8071512100F

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.3GHz, Bulldozer.
Release date: Q4 2011.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.3GHz, Alder Lake.
Release date: Q1 2022.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 56,723 user samples
44,863 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 41% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 41% Great: 60%
SPEED RANK: 727th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
11,860 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 135th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
53.5 % 94.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+76%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.8 Pts 83.8 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+9%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
55.7 Pts 172 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+209%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
101 Pts 323 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+220%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
171 Pts 565 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+230%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
215 Pts 788 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+267%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
84 Pts 91 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
67.3 Pts 178 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+164%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
124 Pts 344 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+177%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
211 Pts 647 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+207%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
269 Pts 823 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+206%
Market Share
Based on 69,034,367 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.37 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,600%
Value
Value For Money
78.9 % 134 % Much better value.
+70%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 92 % Much more popular.
+74%
Price
Price (score)
$68 Cheaper.
+11%
$77
Age
Newest
157 Months 34 Months Much more recent.
+78%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts 58 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+39%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
6 threads 8 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm 10 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+69%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.3 GHz 3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.9 GHz 4.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+10%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
269 Pts 828 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+208%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
219 Pts 795 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+263%
Series
CPU Architecture
Bulldozer Alder Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM3+ FCLGA1700
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None

The AMD FX-6100 has six processing cores, which is above average for a desktop CPU. Single and dual core performance is weak scoring amongst the bottom 30% of desktop processors. Multi core performance is better but still barely above the bottom 10% of processors. At nearly three years of age, the FX-6100 struggles to compete with more recent CPUs. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Gaming is more accessible with the i3-12100F: Intel’s entry level Alder Lake desktop processor. Higher end Alder Lake processors feature a combination of performance and efficiency cores, however, the 12100F contains just four hyper-threaded Golden Cove performance cores. It has a max boost frequency of 4.3 GHz, 12 MB of L3 cache and a 58W TDP. The 12100F is keenly priced at around $130 USD and needs to be paired with a new chipset such as the B660. Only users with discrete GPUs should consider “F” models as they do not have integrated graphics. Whilst a budget PC built around the 12100F represents unbeatable value for money, the 6-core i5-12400F, with 50% stronger multi-core, is a better option for gamers with 3060+ tier GPUs. AMD do not have any CPUs competing in this price segment. Entry level gamers, who cannot find reasonably priced discrete GPUs, could consider the similarly performing Ryzen 5 5600G APU which has integrated RX Vega graphics that are around three times faster than Intel's UHD 730. [Jan '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback