Average Bench: 56.8% (190th of 959)

Based on 54,867 user benchmarks.  Devices: 178BFBFF00600F20, Model: AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The AMD is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a sever proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Average average bench

The AMD FX-8350 averaged 43.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Multi Core Integer Speed 492Pts
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 483Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD FX-8350 is just 15.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD FX-8350 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Quad Core Floating Point Speed 254Pts
Single Core Floating Point Speed 71.3Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 54,867 samples)
Min Avg Max
67.4 SC Int 81.7 93.3
63.4 SC Float 71.3 79.7
66.5 SC Mixed 76.3 85.8
61.2% 76.4 Pts
Min Avg Max
231 QC Int 292 343
218 QC Float 254 294
231 QC Mixed 278 322
62.3% 275 Pts
Min Avg Max
390 MC Int 492 576
344 MC Float 424 491
395 MC Mixed 483 567
70.1% 466 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
SC Int 93.1
SC Float 80.3
SC Mixed 86.5
69% 86.6 Pts
QC Int 354
QC Float 306
QC Mixed 321
74% 327 Pts
MC Int 565
MC Float 488
MC Mixed 555
81% 536 Pts
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
SC Int 82.6
SC Float 74.2
SC Mixed 78.2
63% 78.3 Pts
QC Int 292
QC Float 251
QC Mixed 294
63% 279 Pts
MC Int 532
MC Float 458
MC Mixed 526
76% 505 Pts
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
SC Int 86.6
SC Float 74.1
SC Mixed 79.8
64% 80.2 Pts
QC Int 291
QC Float 250
QC Mixed 280
62% 274 Pts
MC Int 513
MC Float 426
MC Mixed 486
72% 475 Pts
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
SC Int 84.2
SC Float 71.3
SC Mixed 76.5
62% 77.3 Pts
QC Int 298
QC Float 262
QC Mixed 285
64% 282 Pts
MC Int 500
MC Float 430
MC Mixed 490
71% 473 Pts
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
SC Int 86.1
SC Float 74
SC Mixed 79.6
64% 79.9 Pts
QC Int 289
QC Float 248
QC Mixed 276
62% 271 Pts
MC Int 513
MC Float 447
MC Mixed 500
73% 486 Pts
54,867 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 3,778,557 CPUs tested.

 Prices

AmazonUS $124.9922 mins ago.
OutletPCUS $129.444 hrs ago.
BHPhotoUS $129.9913 days ago.
NeweggUS $129.992 hrs ago.
EbayUS $135.905 mins ago.
Send price feedback
Typical FX-8350 Builds (Compare 5,743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $813

Popular FX-8350 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2017 CPU Rankings.

Welcome to our desktop CPU comparison. We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by price to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Calculated values don't always paint the whole picture so we check them against hundreds of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

 Comments

The industry’s first and only native 8-core desktop processor....

  • CPU Model: FX-8350
  • CPU Line: AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition
  • Frequency: 4000
  • Socket Type: AM3+
  • Power Wattage: 125
Added 4 years ago.

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

6 hrs ago.

Comment 

I love it...for the price. Octacore processing that pushes multicore functionality to a hardcore intel quad core at a better price. If the motherboards were cheaper, I would go intel sooner. Although their processors at the same functionality and power are around the same price, the competing mobos are more expensive. A sabertooth and flagship cpu combo at 400 dollars, you can't beat that price per performance. Intel is the overall winner, but on a budget, this CPU is not a bad replacement—Sep '14

Comment 

Purchased based on what I could afford, so I'm not going to whine about what benchmark scores I get, I bought CPU for $130, Gigabyte MB for 130, Intel was going to have to be another 100 or more, ...just wasnt going to pay that much. Plus, Intel has habit of changing/dumping socket standards, AMD keeps theirs, so I look forward to dropping new CPU in same board in the future.....I've got too many other things I need to spend money on...this is fine.—Mar '15


Good

21 hrs ago.

i have one and it does everything i ask of it

Comment 

Still (one of) the best bang for buck options when faced with the new motherboard + CPU upgrade choice works out 30% cheaper than buying equivalent or better Intel option and you'll probably have a longer upgrade cycle. Runs stable with a 400mhz, 10% overclock, needs a proper cooler but so do Intel.—Dec '14


Good

4 days ago.

a performer when OC, for the single core aps and a beast in multitasking, the number of pci e lanes is not limited for my SLI of GTX like intel's 8/8 sockets and you can put in 3 gpus in 16/8/8, 6 ports sata 600 integrated in cpu.with a good cooler and psu you can push it to 5 Ghz and more with a very good motherboard (sabertoth 990fx r2 is one of the best).i was an Intel addict and this amd cpu had surprise me.It does all you want very fast and in the same time, what else ?

Comment 

excellent processeur en hyperthread, fait tourner mon SLI de 780 GTX à 100 pour 100 , les deux dcuii à 100/100.Donc, pas de problemes, jamais sur les genoux et toujours de la réserve .trés bon en encodage—Apr '15


Good

1 day ago.

works wery well


Good

2 hrs ago.

Have some scholary things to run for long times, this one really shines both in letting go octathreaded or run a single thread and a heavy game or whatever else while waiting for it to finish.


Poor

17 days ago.

id love this cpu its so cheap for that much perfomanance


Average

3 years ago.

Review  www.xbitlabs.com/...

Image  www.xbitlabs.com/...
CPU-Z (Stock clock)

CPU-Z (Stock clock)

Image  www.xbitlabs.com/...
CPU-Z Overclocked to 4.7 MHz

CPU-Z Overclocked to 4.7 MHz


Good

19 hrs ago.

Have a super response speed for this price thx AMD.


Poor

4 days ago.

Great processor for the money. Very reliable and tried and trusted.


Good

17 days ago.

this amd cpu is really good. people always said it lose to intel, idk why. for me, i always have freeze when i use intel cpu, and i respect amd more as they always be the innovator.


Liked

13 days ago.

Comment 

Best I could have.—Mar '15


Poor

8 hrs ago.

Great


Poor

5 days ago.

Cant even par with i5 4690


Good

14 days ago.

Being the proud owner of the current best 8350 benchmark on UserBenchmark (73.5 as i type this), this CPU will give you a lot of value for your money. And can with ease be overclocked to 4.9ghz if you got the motherboard it requires. Might be old, but it give you plenty of room to work with as a casual gamer and basic productivity user.


Good

21 days ago.

just purchased , good good


Good

3 months ago.

is good


Good

1 month ago.

Price/Performance King!


Very good

4 years ago.

The FX 8-Core Black gives the i5 3570K a run for its money on multi-threaded workstation loads. There is, however, no clear winner because the FX 8-Core has weaker single threaded and therefore real world consumer performance and is also less energy efficiency. Overall this is a refreshingly strong contender from AMD and holds its own in the upper value segment of the server orientated CPU market.


Good

14 months ago.

Nice Budget Gaming GPU


Outstanding

12 months ago.

Great overclocking, cool temps, great value, great workstation use


Very good

1 month ago.

Why is this chip still such a beast? I'm honestly blown away by how much staying power this old of a system build has had for me. Granted, I've been through three graphics cards, and this last one (gtx 1080 hybrid FTW) is going to transfer into a new build this year, but I really have no need or desire to put this old thing out to pasture, just yet. It'll serve for years to come, most likely, as a starter PC for my youngest child (likely with an RX 480).


Very good

2 years ago.

Good overclocking and multicore performance


Your
opinion?
▲Like   ▼Dislike

You have viewed 40 pages, please contribute.


959 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $368Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i5-7600K $240AMD RX 480 $210Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $127
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $300Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $155
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback