Average Bench: 56.5% (193rd of 961)

Based on 66,720 user benchmarks.  Devices: 178BFBFF00600F20, Model: AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The AMD is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a sever proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]


Average average bench

The AMD FX-8350 averaged 43.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Multi Core Integer Speed 488Pts
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 480Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD FX-8350 is just 18.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD FX-8350 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Quad Core Floating Point Speed 253Pts
Single Core Floating Point Speed 70.7Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 66,720 samples)
Min Avg Max
66.2 SC Int 81 91.5
59.1 SC Float 70.7 79.2
62.8 SC Mixed 75.5 84.5
60.6% 75.8 Pts
Min Avg Max
225 QC Int 292 342
195 QC Float 253 292
215 QC Mixed 277 320
62.2% 274 Pts
Min Avg Max
374 MC Int 488 566
333 MC Float 422 486
357 MC Mixed 480 557
69.7% 463 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
SC Int 82.4
SC Float 69.2
SC Mixed 74.7
60% 75.4 Pts
QC Int 308
QC Float 271
QC Mixed 294
66% 291 Pts
MC Int 506
MC Float 433
MC Mixed 493
72% 477 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
SC Int 80.9
SC Float 70.6
SC Mixed 77.2
61% 76.2 Pts
QC Int 284
QC Float 247
QC Mixed 272
61% 268 Pts
MC Int 529
MC Float 447
MC Mixed 515
75% 497 Pts
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
SC Int 82.7
SC Float 71.8
SC Mixed 75.7
61% 76.7 Pts
QC Int 293
QC Float 253
QC Mixed 279
62% 275 Pts
MC Int 444
MC Float 386
MC Mixed 452
64% 427 Pts
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
SC Int 86.6
SC Float 74.3
SC Mixed 79.2
64% 80 Pts
QC Int 294
QC Float 232
QC Mixed 262
60% 263 Pts
MC Int 513
MC Float 439
MC Mixed 502
73% 485 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
SC Int 80.3
SC Float 71.4
SC Mixed 77.6
61% 76.4 Pts
QC Int 281
QC Float 237
QC Mixed 265
59% 261 Pts
MC Int 501
MC Float 428
MC Mixed 488
71% 472 Pts
66,720 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 4,134,475 CPUs tested.


EbayUS $124.1722 mins ago.
AmazonUS $125.999 mins ago.
OutletPCUS $126.8311 hrs ago.
BHPhotoUS $129.991 month ago.
NeweggUS $129.992 hrs ago.
Send price feedback
Typical FX-8350 Builds (Compare 6,229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 56%
Desktop 54%
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $893

Popular FX-8350 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2017 CPU Rankings.

Welcome to our desktop CPU comparison. We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by price to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Calculated values don't always paint the whole picture so we check them against hundreds of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]


The industry’s first and only native 8-core desktop processor....

  • CPU Model: FX-8350
  • CPU Line: AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition
  • Frequency: 4000
  • Socket Type: AM3+
  • Power Wattage: 125
Added 4 years ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

2 days ago.

Overclocked to a stable 5.05GHz with a Corsair H100i V2 AiO. You can't beat the value of AMD processors.


I love it...for the price. Octacore processing that pushes multicore functionality to a hardcore intel quad core at a better price. If the motherboards were cheaper, I would go intel sooner. Although their processors at the same functionality and power are around the same price, the competing mobos are more expensive. A sabertooth and flagship cpu combo at 400 dollars, you can't beat that price per performance. Intel is the overall winner, but on a budget, this CPU is not a bad replacement—Sep '14


Purchased based on what I could afford, so I'm not going to whine about what benchmark scores I get, I bought CPU for $130, Gigabyte MB for 130, Intel was going to have to be another 100 or more, ...just wasnt going to pay that much. Plus, Intel has habit of changing/dumping socket standards, AMD keeps theirs, so I look forward to dropping new CPU in same board in the future.....I've got too many other things I need to spend money on...this is fine.—Mar '15


3 days ago.

For its price and age it as stood up well,still pushes decently with most tasks although there is some stuttering at times from it, but its £100 roughly so you can't complain much


Still (one of) the best bang for buck options when faced with the new motherboard + CPU upgrade choice works out 30% cheaper than buying equivalent or better Intel option and you'll probably have a longer upgrade cycle. Runs stable with a 400mhz, 10% overclock, needs a proper cooler but so do Intel.—Dec '14


4 days ago.

works wery well


9 days ago.

a performer when OC, for the single core aps and a beast in multitasking, the number of pci e lanes is not limited for my SLI of GTX like intel's 8/8 sockets and you can put in 3 gpus in 16/8/8, 6 ports sata 600 integrated in cpu.with a good cooler and psu you can push it to 5 Ghz and more with a very good motherboard (sabertoth 990fx r2 is one of the best).i was an Intel addict and this amd cpu had surprise me.It does all you want very fast and in the same time, what else ?


excellent processeur en hyperthread, fait tourner mon SLI de 780 GTX à 100 pour 100 , les deux dcuii à 100/100.Donc, pas de problemes, jamais sur les genoux et toujours de la réserve .trés bon en encodage—Apr '15


1 day ago.

Have some scholary things to run for long times, this one really shines both in letting go octathreaded or run a single thread and a heavy game or whatever else while waiting for it to finish.


17 days ago.

id love this cpu its so cheap for that much perfomanance


4 years ago.

Review  www.xbitlabs.com/...

Image  www.xbitlabs.com/...
CPU-Z (Stock clock)

CPU-Z (Stock clock)

Image  www.xbitlabs.com/...
CPU-Z Overclocked to 4.7 MHz

CPU-Z Overclocked to 4.7 MHz


5 days ago.

Great processor for the money. Very reliable and tried and trusted.


5 hrs ago.

Have a super response speed for this price thx AMD.


6 days ago.

this amd cpu is really good. people always said it lose to intel, idk why. for me, i always have freeze when i use intel cpu, and i respect amd more as they always be the innovator.


5 days ago.


Best I could have.—Mar '15


4 days ago.

Cant even par with i5 4690


12 days ago.

Being the proud owner of the current best 8350 benchmark on UserBenchmark (73.5 as i type this), this CPU will give you a lot of value for your money. And can with ease be overclocked to 4.9ghz if you got the motherboard it requires. Might be old, but it give you plenty of room to work with as a casual gamer and basic productivity user.


1 month ago.

just purchased , good good


2 months ago.

Price/Performance King!

Very good

4 years ago.

The FX 8-Core Black gives the i5 3570K a run for its money on multi-threaded workstation loads. There is, however, no clear winner because the FX 8-Core has weaker single threaded and therefore real world consumer performance and is also less energy efficiency. Overall this is a refreshingly strong contender from AMD and holds its own in the upper value segment of the server orientated CPU market.


15 months ago.

Nice Budget Gaming GPU


13 months ago.

Great overclocking, cool temps, great value, great workstation use

Very good

3 months ago.

Why is this chip still such a beast? I'm honestly blown away by how much staying power this old of a system build has had for me. Granted, I've been through three graphics cards, and this last one (gtx 1080 hybrid FTW) is going to transfer into a new build this year, but I really have no need or desire to put this old thing out to pasture, just yet. It'll serve for years to come, most likely, as a starter PC for my youngest child (likely with an RX 480).

Very good

2 years ago.

Good overclocking and multicore performance

▲Like ▼Dislike

You have viewed 99 pages, please contribute.

961 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $225AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $278Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $239Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $160
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $133SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback