Average Bench: 56.9% (209th of 985)

Based on 106,220 user benchmarks.  Devices: 178BFBFF00600F20, Model: AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The AMD is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a sever proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Average average bench

The AMD FX-8350 averaged 43.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Multi Core Integer Speed 493Pts
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 485Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD FX-8350 is just 17.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD FX-8350 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Quad Core Floating Point Speed 254Pts
Single Core Floating Point Speed 71.1Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 106,220 samples)
Min Avg Max
69.3 SC Int 81.7 91.9
62.6 SC Float 71.1 79
65.4 SC Mixed 76.2 84.8
61.1% 76.3 Pts
Min Avg Max
226 QC Int 292 339
215 QC Float 254 294
231 QC Mixed 279 319
62.4% 275 Pts
Min Avg Max
381 MC Int 493 564
355 MC Float 427 485
376 MC Mixed 485 556
70.5% 469 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
SC Int 65.9
SC Float 65.5
SC Mixed 78.3
56% 69.9 Pts
QC Int 288
QC Float 285
QC Mixed 306
66% 293 Pts
MC Int 484
MC Float 442
MC Mixed 506
72% 478 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
SC Int 72.7
SC Float 69.9
SC Mixed 71.5
57% 71.4 Pts
QC Int 268
QC Float 250
QC Mixed 284
61% 267 Pts
MC Int 540
MC Float 460
MC Mixed 531
77% 510 Pts
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
SC Int 77.6
SC Float 69.7
SC Mixed 75.3
59% 74.2 Pts
QC Int 290
QC Float 245
QC Mixed 280
62% 272 Pts
MC Int 483
MC Float 420
MC Mixed 468
69% 457 Pts
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
SC Int 73.9
SC Float 69.5
SC Mixed 73.8
58% 72.4 Pts
QC Int 283
QC Float 249
QC Mixed 275
61% 269 Pts
MC Int 489
MC Float 418
MC Mixed 473
69% 460 Pts
106,220 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 7,494,067 CPUs tested.

 Prices

Approx. $225 @ launch in Oct '12
OutletPCUS $11915 hrs
NeweggUS $1201 month
EbayUS $12616 mins
AmazonUS $12910 mins
BHPhotoUS $1307 hrs
Send price feedback
Typical FX-8350 Builds (Compare 13,292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) - $102

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $509

Popular FX-8350 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2018 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance and price.

 Comments

The industry’s first and only native 8-core desktop processor....

  • CPU Model: FX-8350
  • CPU Line: AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition
  • Frequency: 4000
  • Socket Type: AM3+
  • Power Wattage: 125
Added 4 years ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

3 days ago.

ok

Comment 

I love it...for the price. Octacore processing that pushes multicore functionality to a hardcore intel quad core at a better price. If the motherboards were cheaper, I would go intel sooner. Although their processors at the same functionality and power are around the same price, the competing mobos are more expensive. A sabertooth and flagship cpu combo at 400 dollars, you can't beat that price per performance. Intel is the overall winner, but on a budget, this CPU is not a bad replacement—Sep '14

Comment 

Purchased based on what I could afford, so I'm not going to whine about what benchmark scores I get, I bought CPU for $130, Gigabyte MB for 130, Intel was going to have to be another 100 or more, ...just wasnt going to pay that much. Plus, Intel has habit of changing/dumping socket standards, AMD keeps theirs, so I look forward to dropping new CPU in same board in the future.....I've got too many other things I need to spend money on...this is fine.—Mar '15


Good

6 months ago.

can update with old motherboard


Excellent

3 days ago.

beast for it's price


Excellent

9 hrs ago.

beste cpu


Good

20 hrs ago.

bit shit really

Comment 

Still (one of) the best bang for buck options when faced with the new motherboard + CPU upgrade choice works out 30% cheaper than buying equivalent or better Intel option and you'll probably have a longer upgrade cycle. Runs stable with a 400mhz, 10% overclock, needs a proper cooler but so do Intel.—Dec '14


Excellent

8 days ago.

Runs most games quite well on medium to high, although to play new AAA games, such as Destiny 2, decently it doesn't preform up to par but it does work well enough even with the help of a good GPU liked a 1070


Poor

6 days ago.

a good cpu, in his time ...

Comment 

excellent processeur en hyperthread, fait tourner mon SLI de 780 GTX à 100 pour 100 , les deux dcuii à 100/100.Donc, pas de problemes, jamais sur les genoux et toujours de la réserve .trés bon en encodage—Apr '15


Terrible

1 month ago.

id love this cpu its so cheap for that much perfomanance


Excellent

26 days ago.

ef


Good

2 months ago.

works wery well


Excellent

12 days ago.

Have a super response speed for this price thx AMD.


Excellent

2 months ago.

Great processor for the money. Very reliable and tried and trusted.


Excellent

24 days ago.

BEST


Excellent

2 months ago.

works great


Good

16 days ago.

Solved my needs, now with new GPU and games like PUBG I need to upgrade.


Poor

8 months ago.

this amd cpu is really good. people always said it lose to intel, idk why. for me, i always have freeze when i use intel cpu, and i respect amd more as they always be the innovator.


Good

8 months ago.

Cant even par with i5 4690


Excellent

6 months ago.

Comment 

Best I could have.—Mar '15


Average

4 years ago.

Review  www.xbitlabs.com/...

Image  www.xbitlabs.com/...
CPU-Z (Stock clock)

CPU-Z (Stock clock)

Image  www.xbitlabs.com/...
CPU-Z Overclocked to 4.7 MHz

CPU-Z Overclocked to 4.7 MHz


Terrible

13 hrs ago.

i got i5 u suckers


Excellent

1 month ago.

I have one.


Good

2 months ago.

nice cpu


Excellent

2 month ago.

Being the proud owner of the current best 8350 benchmark on UserBenchmark (73.5 as i type this), this CPU will give you a lot of value for your money. And can with ease be overclocked to 4.9ghz if you got the motherboard it requires. Might be old, but it give you plenty of room to work with as a casual gamer and basic productivity user.


Good

9 months ago.

just purchased , good good


Excellent

3 months ago.

beast


Good

10 months ago.

Price/Performance King!


Terrible

5 months ago.

low perfomance for that price


Very good

4 years ago.

The FX 8-Core Black gives the i5 3570K a run for its money on multi-threaded workstation loads. There is, however, no clear winner because the FX 8-Core has weaker single threaded and therefore real world consumer performance and is also less energy efficiency. Overall this is a refreshingly strong contender from AMD and holds its own in the upper value segment of the server orientated CPU market.


Good

23 months ago.

Nice Budget Gaming GPU


Outstanding

21 months ago.

Great overclocking, cool temps, great value, great workstation use


Excellent

2 month ago.

My first prozessor with overcloacking. Couldn't get it to 5GHZ but still loved it anyway. RIP my old friend


Good

4 months ago.

As long as my renders take less than 3 minutes, I'm fine with it.


Very good

11 months ago.

Why is this chip still such a beast? I'm honestly blown away by how much staying power this old of a system build has had for me. Granted, I've been through three graphics cards, and this last one (gtx 1080 hybrid FTW) is going to transfer into a new build this year, but I really have no need or desire to put this old thing out to pasture, just yet. It'll serve for years to come, most likely, as a starter PC for my youngest child (likely with an RX 480).


Very good

3 years ago.

Good overclocking and multicore performance


Your
opinion?
985 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $313Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
Intel Core i7-7700K $288Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $146
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $185SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $206SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback