Real World Speed
Performance profile from 207,308 user samples
207,308 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 40% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 40% Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 303rd / 1182
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
47.9 % 87.4 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+82%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
74.1 Pts 128 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+73%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
143 Pts 254 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+78%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
270 Pts 497 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+84%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
460 Pts 863 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+88%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
466 Pts 1,128 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+142%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
82.8 Pts 139 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+68%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
161 Pts 277 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+72%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
309 Pts 550 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+78%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
538 Pts 981 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+82%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
540 Pts 1,250 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+131%
Market Share
Based on 19,361,331 CPUs tested.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
73 % 123 % Much more popular.
+69%
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.96 % 1.61 % Much higher market share.
+67%
Price
Price (score)
$105 Hugely cheaper.
+156%
268 USD
Value
Value For Money
62.7 % 89.7 % Much better value.
+43%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 Watts 86.1 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+45%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Slightly higher core count.
+12%
7.11 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
8 threads 12.7 threads Much higher thread count.
+58%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm 12.2 nm Hugely newer manufacturing.
+162%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+12%
3.57 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.2 GHz 4.39 GHz +4%
Age
Newest
82 Months 13.7 Months Hugely more recent.
+500%
Series
CPU Architecture
Piledriver   —
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM3+   —
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None   —
ADVERTISEMENT

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The AMD is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical gamers and desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $233Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback