Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 22:55
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 428
54% 408 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 38.3
30% 38.5 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 27.4
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 807 1017 1034 1215 874 834 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 914
Write 819
Mixed 784
SusWrite 964
196% 870 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 70.6
222% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,037
DQ Write 856
DQ Mixed 941
706% 945 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 207%
Great: 429%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
262GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 411 421 463 466 466 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 371
Write 366
Mixed 369
SusWrite 426
87% 383 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 48.4
159% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 359
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
582GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1633 1834 1849 797 384 467 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,104
Write 1,293
Mixed 1,188
SusWrite 1,161
268% 1,186 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 62.3
200% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,154
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 1,012
759% 1,017 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 223%
Great: 365%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 115 117 114 117 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 154
Write 131
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 112
156% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 72%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050 500GB
466GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 115 117 115 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 105
Write 115
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 112
124% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 27.4
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 24.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 24" 1280 720 AOC0001 2460
Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback