Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 02:15
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 222
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 397
46% 357 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700
PowerColor(148C 2417) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 10GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 130
Parallax 229
92% 157 fps
MRender 209
Gravity 118
Splatting 188
141% 172 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-desire(p) 512G 512GB
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400fAA13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 996
Write 610
Mixed 109
124% 572 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 44.4
136% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 89.5
84% 133 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 205%
Adata SU630 240GB
174GB free
Firmware: V8X04c12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 368
Write 336
Mixed 293
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 27.1
98% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 185
144% 196 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
782GB free
Firmware: 00.0NS03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 85.3
Write 90.7
Mixed 60.1
59% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 27.2
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 23.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 1R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 11% 28 194 11 144 23.8" 1280 720 SAM710B F24G3xTF
Typical X370M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback