Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateJul 04 '21 at 03:17
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 152
2-Core 301
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,166
105% 882 Pts
64-Core 2,108
130% 2,108 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
XFX(1682 9580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 62.3
Reflection 60.2
Parallax 85.7
51% 69.4 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 46.8
46% 58.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$50
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1482 1519 1227 1236 1161 567 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2067
Write 1,484
Mixed 210
SusWrite 1,199
275% 1,240 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 69.5
275% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 785
DQ Write 1242
DQ Mixed 443
496% 823 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 285%
Great: 311%
Spcc Solid State Disk 480GB
80GB free
Firmware: Q1115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 670 33 178 35 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 104%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
198GB free
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 206 207 196 200 185 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 714
Write 634
Mixed 511
SusWrite 207
115% 516 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 41.4
162% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 509
DQ Mixed 402
351% 525 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 117%
Great: 144%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 128 124 134 132 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 81.3
Write 103
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 128
22% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 0.7
6% 3.17 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 7.2
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13%
Great: 18%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
128GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 94 92 91 28 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43% Average
Read 73
Write 70
Mixed 55
SusWrite 76.8
51% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43%
Great: 68%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 129 123 133 136 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68% Good
Read 106
Write 141
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 130
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
216% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 68%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HUS726060ALA640 6TB
242GB free
Firmware: AHGNT1EN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 163 162 164 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 134
Write 139
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 163
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 101%
WDC WD50 00BPKT-75PK4T0 500GB
60GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 9.8 1.8 3.5 18 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 74.3
Write 74.5
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 11.3
65% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 41%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050 500GB
132GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 13 16 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 17.8
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 16.3
27% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 48.3
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 42.9
126% 44 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 36.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 2R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 12% 34 111 8 60 34.1" 2560 1080 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $719
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback