Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A78L-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M LE  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 14:05
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 124
58% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 318
30% 248 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 858B) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 8
5% 6.53 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB150G7 150GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N2010121
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 84 89 87 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 129
Write 175
Mixed 108
SusWrite 81.9
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 23.1
82% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 59.8
DQ Mixed 27.2
25% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$50
465GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 97 89 89 89 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 115
Write 104
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 90.2
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 69%
Specific STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
27GB free, PID 0918
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 10 9.8 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 3.3
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 10.8
12% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M LE Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback