Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel U7300 1,665 User benchmarks, average bench 30% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Memory 60.2 1-Core 25.3 2-Core 50.2 32% 45.2 Pts	4-Core 47.5 8-Core 49.5 6% 48.5 Pts	64-Core 48.5 3% 48.5 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 335M 977 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 0443) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	2.8% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 1.7 3% 2.7 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 1.9 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.8% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q Series Pro 256GB-$109 1,725 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: JTRA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 162 155 155 144 151 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.9% Below average	Read 213 Write 175 Mixed 194 SusWrite 153 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 21.8 54% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 85.6 DQ Mixed 99.1 74% 97.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.27 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
U7300IntelBench 30%, 1,665 samples	26x
U4100IntelBench 29%, 1,054 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 335MNvidiaBench 3%, 977 samples	27x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
PM800 Series 2.5" 256GBSamsungBench 24%, 1,200 samples	2x
Ignite 240GBPatriot $123Bench 88%, 2,261 samples	2x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $36