TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel

Celeron N3350

▲ 51367 ▼

2 Cores, 2 Threads @1.10 GHz, Apollo Lake.
Release date ≈ Q4 2016.

Average Bench: 20.9% (1437th of 1459)

Based on 14,922 user benchmarks.  Device: BFEBFBFF000506C9 Model: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3350 @ 1.10GHz
Poor: 9%Average: 20.9% Great: 30%
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Popular builds with this CPU

Very poor average bench

The Intel Celeron N3350 averaged 79.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 31.1Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 35.2Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Celeron N3350 is 20.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Celeron N3350 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 63.3Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 65.1Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 14,922 samples)
Rank 143720.9%
Min Avg Max
10.1 Memory 31.1 46.3
15.6 1-Core 35.2 44
23.4 2-Core 61.4 85
25.3% 42.6 Pts
Min Avg Max
28.3 4-Core 63.4 84.7
32.3 8-Core 65.1 84.9
8.55% 64.3 Pts
Min Avg Max
29.7 64-Core 63.3 84.4
3.9% 63.3 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
25% Poor
Memory 39.1
1-Core 39.5
2-Core 67.9
30% 48.8 Pts
4-Core 64.9
8-Core 66.4
9% 65.7 Pts
64-Core 61
4% 61 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
22.5% Poor
Memory 33.8
1-Core 39.7
2-Core 72.6
28% 48.7 Pts
4-Core 63.7
8-Core 74.3
9% 69 Pts
64-Core 72.2
4% 72.2 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
22.4% Poor
Memory 35.8
1-Core 35
2-Core 36
24% 35.6 Pts
4-Core 55.2
8-Core 45
7% 50.1 Pts
64-Core 67.4
4% 67.4 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
20.5% Poor
Memory 30.8
1-Core 39.2
2-Core 70.2
27% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 60.5
8-Core 62.1
8% 61.3 Pts
64-Core 61.2
4% 61.2 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
18% Very poor
Memory 26.3
1-Core 33.1
2-Core 55.8
23% 38.4 Pts
4-Core 56.9
8-Core 56.6
8% 56.8 Pts
64-Core 54.5
3% 54.5 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
15% Very poor
Memory 22.6
1-Core 25.7
2-Core 43.6
18% 30.6 Pts
4-Core 43.2
8-Core 43.8
6% 43.5 Pts
64-Core 43
3% 43 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
9.97% Terrible
Memory 7.53
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 71.6
18% 36.7 Pts
4-Core 71.7
8-Core 69.3
10% 70.5 Pts
64-Core 52.7
3% 52.7 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
8.59% Terrible
Memory 8.83
1-Core 27.8
2-Core 39.4
14% 25.3 Pts
4-Core 47.1
8-Core 53.6
7% 50.3 Pts
64-Core 54.3
3% 54.3 Pts
14,922 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,303,324 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Celeron N3350 Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X541NA

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples187x
GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples208x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples167x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples17x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples15x
A400 480GBKingston  $34Bench 74%, 237,487 samples12x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples10x
RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples374x
1x8GBSamsungBench 32%, 1,334 samples16x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28

Popular Celeron N3350 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Celeron® Processor N3350 (2M Cache, up to 2.4 GHz)
Code NameApollo Lake
Launch DateQ3'16
Processor NumberN3350
# of Cores2
# of Threads2
Burst Frequency2.40 GHz
Cache2 MB L2
Instruction Set64-bit
Embedded Options AvailableYes
Lithography14 nm
Recommended Price$107.00
Clock Speed1.10 GHz
Max TDP6 W
Scenario Design Power4 W

Graphics

Processor GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics 500
Graphics Base Frequency200.00 MHz
Graphics Burst Frequency650.00 MHz
Graphics OutputeDP/DP/HDMI/MIPI-DSI
Wireless DisplayNo
# of Displays Supported3
Quick Sync VideoYes
InTru 3D TechNo
Clear Video HD TechYes
Clear Video Tech for MIDYes
Graphics Video Max Memory8 GB

Memory

Max Memory Size8 GB
Memory TypesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Memory Channels2
ECC Memory SupportedNo

I/O

USB Revision2.0/3.0
# of USB Ports8
General Purpose IOYes
UARTYes
Total # of SATA Ports2
Integrated LANNo
Max # of SATA 6.0 Gb/s Ports2

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision2.0
PCI Express Configurations1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2
Max # of PCI Express Lanes6

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes
Secure KeyYes

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost TechNo
Hyper-Threading TechNo
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
vPro TechNo
Identity Protection TechYes
Rapid Storage TechNo
Smart Connect TechNo
Secure BootYes
HD Audio TechYes
Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)No
Small Business AdvantageNo
Smart Response TechNo
Virtualization Tech for Itanium (VT-i)No

Package

Package Size24mm x 31mm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedFCBGA1296

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
OS GuardNo
Trusted Execution TechNo
Anti-Theft TechNo

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
9,918

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

4 months ago.

slower than a core 2 duo from 2008?

GBR-User
Avatar level
5,828

Terrible

3 days ago.

lags when opening google, its that bad.

CAN-User
Avatar level
5,010

Terrible

7 months ago.

this is very bad, I can detect the slowness of this even on a chromebook while doing web browsing

FRA-User
Avatar level
4,611

Good

2 years ago.

Fine CPU for basic desktop use. Leaves a little bit to be desired but it's expected for a such a cheap unit.

AUS-User
Avatar level
3,998

Poor

2 years ago.

The more technical term for this processor is "e-waste".

CZE-User
Avatar level
3,366

Terrible

10 months ago.

Uhh.. Even moving with a mouse lags.

BGR-User
Avatar level
2,916

Average

3 years ago.

this thing is ok for videos on youtube and web browsing but anything more than that will make it slow

TWN-User
Avatar level
2,904

Excellent

3 years ago.

Better performance for personal and office use but not for gaming

leftlord
Avatar level
14

Excellent

13 months ago.

good and cheap choise for everyday use

rickyt11010
Avatar level
4

Good

3 years ago.

Better than I expected for light Linux laptop work and Light emulation. Runs GTA Vice City Stories through ppsspp just fine so I'm happy. Doesn't help its branding though that Intel rebranded the n3350e back to the original designation of n3350.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 7 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs Intel Core i7-13700K
vs Intel Core i5-12400
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

1459 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback