Asus X541NA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.09%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X541NA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X541NA
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 09:03
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.09% Terrible
Memory 10.6
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 20
13% 20.7 Pts
4-Core 41.2
8-Core 59.2
6% 50.2 Pts
64-Core 36.1
2% 36.1 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.09%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Asus(1043 16A0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9507
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 2
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 2
Splatting 0.3
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM08.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 113 16 12 11 8.9 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.4% Below average
Read 166
Write 146
Mixed 146
SusWrite 52.3
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 14
54% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 97.7
DQ Mixed 64.7
61% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 5
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 1.6
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 398
10% 398 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 2R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 11% 45 12 2 60 15.5" 1366 768 AUO70EC
Typical X541NA Builds (Compare 401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X541NA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback