Average Bench: 84.2% (85th of 1265)

Based on 8,151 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00860F01 Model: AMD Ryzen 7 4800H with Radeon Graphics

Ryzen 4000 Mobile CPUs offer benchmark busting multi-core performance on the go, but marketing hype aside, it’s unclear how this will translate to real world performance. Sixteen threads are great for beating benchmarks including UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU but gamers need performance in the games that they actually play. At launch, the top GPU available in a 4000 series laptop is the RTX 2060. Since the GPU is largely responsible for overall gaming performance, the Ryzen 4000 laptops will offer mid tier gaming performance at best. Pairing stronger GPUs would be suboptimal because the Zen gaming bottleneck becomes increasingly severe with more powerful GPUs. Streamers and media producers, who may have historically benefited from high core counts, are better off using the GPU (NVENC or QuickSync) for encoding. Leading media creation applications including both DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Premiere Pro are largely GPU bound. With low power consumption and high core counts, the 4000 range, on paper at least, is a perfect fit for the datacenter. AMD should focus on delivering a platform that offers performance where end users actually need it rather than targeting inexperienced gamers with the same old "moar cores" mantra. From a gamer’s perspective, the best feature of the 4000 series laptops is the absence of the equally hyped 5000 series GPUs. Prospective gaming laptop buyers will find lower latency (and therefore better gaming) CPUs combined with faster GPUs at similar price points. [Mar '20 CPUPro]

Very good average bench

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800H averaged just 15.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H near the top of the comparison list.


Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed 492Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 122Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H is 25.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. Memory Latency 76.6Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 881Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 8,151 samples)
Min Avg Max
60.9 Memory 76.6 82
72 1-Core 122 138
139 2-Core 244 276
82.8% 147 Pts
Min Avg Max
345 4-Core 492 550
532 8-Core 881 1,067
85.8% 687 Pts
Min Avg Max
730 64-Core 1,263 1,479
84.7% 1,263 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Memory 78.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 270
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 900
91% 719 Pts
64-Core 1,210
81% 1,210 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 79.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 265
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 940
92% 735 Pts
64-Core 1,292
87% 1,292 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 77.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 1,069
99% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,478
99% 1,478 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Memory 76
1-Core 138
2-Core 273
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 950
93% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,389
93% 1,389 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Memory 77.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 272
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 927
91% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,411
95% 1,411 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Memory 74.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 263
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 913
91% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,279
86% 1,279 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Memory 73.6
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 150
60% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 825
79% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,024
69% 1,024 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Memory 75.8
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 163
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 479
49% 386 Pts
64-Core 659
44% 659 Pts
8,151 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 33,601,351 CPUs tested.

Typical Ryzen 7 4800H Builds (Compare 1,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 20%
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 20%

System: Asus TUF Gaming FA506IV_FA506IV


Popular Ryzen 7 4800H systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2020 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

2 days ago.

Paired with a 1660TI it kills 1080p and still reasonably better than consoles at 1440p


7 days ago.

Does Intel now write the reviews for userbench? Seriously look at the ridcliously conclusion... Yeah it's benches great, yeah the people love it, yeah it's on par with the best core processors intel has to offer on terms of singlecore performance, yeah it's a lot more efficent in doing so and yeah it's rips apart intel when it comes to multicore performance... But who needs all of this? Buy Intel!


6 days ago.

much more better


20 days ago.

I think that this processor is AMAZING for mid range gaming rigs. The specs on paper are really good and it performs good.


2 days ago.

Because it gives multi core performance Low prices


6 days ago.

I always prefer AMD over Intel. Based on my experience using several processors from both, I think AMD is underrated.


6 months ago.


1 month ago.

Very powerful CPU

1265 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback