Average Bench: 82.1% (145th of 1335)

Based on 54,428 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00860F01 Model: AMD Ryzen 7 4800H with Radeon Graphics

Ryzen 4000 Mobile CPUs offer benchmark busting multi-core performance on the go, but marketing hype aside, it’s unclear how this will translate to real world performance. Sixteen threads are great for beating benchmarks including UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU but gamers need performance in the games that they actually play. At launch, the top GPU available in a 4000 series laptop is the RTX 2060. Since the GPU is largely responsible for overall gaming performance, the Ryzen 4000 laptops will offer mid tier gaming performance at best. Pairing stronger GPUs would be suboptimal because the Zen gaming bottleneck becomes increasingly severe with more powerful GPUs. Streamers and media producers, who may have historically benefited from high core counts, are better off using the GPU (NVENC or QuickSync) for encoding. Leading media creation applications including both DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Premiere Pro are largely GPU bound. With low power consumption and high core counts, the 4000 range, on paper at least, is a perfect fit for the datacenter. AMD should focus on delivering a platform that offers performance where end users actually need it rather than targeting inexperienced gamers with the same old "moar cores" mantra. From a gamer’s perspective, the best feature of the 4000 series laptops is the absence of the equally hyped 5000 series GPUs. Prospective gaming laptop buyers will find lower latency (and therefore better gaming) CPUs combined with faster GPUs at similar price points. [Mar '20 CPUPro]

Poor: 64%Average: 82.1% Great: 89%
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

Very good average bench

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800H averaged just 17.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H near the top of the comparison list.


Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 1,313Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 119Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H is 25.7%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. Memory Latency 75.9Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 858Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 54,428 samples)
Min Avg Max
58.3 Memory 75.9 82.6
66.7 1-Core 119 132
137 2-Core 238 264
81.3% 144 Pts
Min Avg Max
331 4-Core 474 526
554 8-Core 858 1,010
83.1% 666 Pts
Min Avg Max
762 64-Core 1,313 1,541
88.1% 1,313 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Memory 79.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 911
90% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,477
99% 1,477 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Memory 79.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 263
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 934
91% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,466
98% 1,466 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Memory 77
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 966
93% 747 Pts
64-Core 1,578
106% 1,578 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Memory 81.5
1-Core 132
2-Core 260
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 901
87% 699 Pts
64-Core 1,476
99% 1,476 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Memory 78.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 260
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 958
91% 734 Pts
64-Core 1,368
92% 1,368 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 76.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 871
86% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,327
89% 1,327 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Memory 74
1-Core 132
2-Core 262
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 957
91% 734 Pts
64-Core 1,492
100% 1,492 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 63.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 262
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 882
87% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,337
90% 1,337 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Memory 67.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 212
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 669
66% 528 Pts
64-Core 871
58% 871 Pts
54,428 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 49,652,081 CPUs tested.

Typical Ryzen 7 4800H Builds (Compare 6,605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 20%
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 20%

System: HP OMEN Laptop 15-en0xxx


Popular Ryzen 7 4800H systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added n/a ago.

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

12 days ago.


Would not recomend for gaming, latency too high—Apr '21


2 months ago.

Great performance for its prize, there is no reason to complain about this processor, its so powerful! I use it for rendering in V-Ray, its really fast. Friend of mine has a notebook with 9750H and i can render the same project about 30% faster.


21 months ago.


13 months ago.

i own it and my friend owns the intel and i want to prove i am superior


4 months ago.

I recently bought an 4800H laptop (HP OMEN 15 2020 EN0004NT) and i love it.It destroys every day-to-day tasks and its one of the best for mobile gaming. Although the laptop that i bought has an 1650Ti (bottleneck for an 8C/16T processor) it still performs great in games.


17 months ago.

Very powerful CPU

1335 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $289Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $50
Intel Core i5-12400F $184Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $245Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback