Average Bench: 72% (320th of 1404)

Based on 2,569 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00860F01 Model: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS with Radeon Graphics

Ryzen 4000 Mobile CPUs offer benchmark busting multi-core performance on the go, but marketing hype aside, it’s unclear how this will translate to real world performance. Sixteen threads are great for beating benchmarks including UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU but gamers need performance in the games that they actually play. At launch, the top GPU available in a 4000 series laptop is the RTX 2060. Since the GPU is largely responsible for overall gaming performance, the Ryzen 4000 laptops will offer mid tier gaming performance at best. Pairing stronger GPUs would be suboptimal because the Zen gaming bottleneck becomes increasingly severe with more powerful GPUs. Streamers and media producers, who may have historically benefited from high core counts, are better off using the GPU (NVENC or QuickSync) for encoding. Leading media creation applications including both DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Premiere Pro are largely GPU bound. With low power consumption and high core counts, the 4000 range, on paper at least, is a perfect fit for the datacenter. AMD should focus on delivering a platform that offers performance where end users actually need it rather than targeting inexperienced gamers with the same old "moar cores" mantra. From a gamer’s perspective, the best feature of the 4000 series laptops is the absence of the equally hyped 5000 series GPUs. Prospective gaming laptop buyers will find lower latency (and therefore better gaming) CPUs combined with faster GPUs at similar price points. [Mar '20 CPUPro]

Good average bench

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS averaged 28.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. Quad Core Speed 403Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 106Pts

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is 44.4%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. Octa Core Speed 699Pts
Avg. Multi Core Speed 1,007Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 2,569 samples)
Min Avg Max
48.2 Memory 68.9 82.1
44.3 1-Core 106 144
83 2-Core 206 286
70.4% 127 Pts
Min Avg Max
184 4-Core 403 558
345 8-Core 699 999
66.7% 551 Pts
Min Avg Max
536 64-Core 1,007 1,326
62.3% 1,007 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Memory 79.1
1-Core 141
2-Core 280
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 1,036
95% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,191
74% 1,191 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Memory 76.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 287
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 1,014
94% 785 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Memory 79.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 272
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 839
83% 680 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 79
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 194
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 751
68% 570 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Memory 67.8
1-Core 51.4
2-Core 110
47% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 348
40% 314 Pts
64-Core 573
36% 573 Pts
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Memory 67.4
1-Core 53.7
2-Core 109
47% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 351
34% 277 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
2,569 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 60,337,763 CPUs tested.

Typical Ryzen 7 4800HS Builds (Compare 220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 18%
Desktop 74%
Workstation 18%

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401IU_GA401IU


Popular Ryzen 7 4800HS systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2023 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

10 months ago.

Would not recomend for gaming, latency too high


22 months ago.

Great performance and battery life for a laptop


2 years ago.


2 years ago.

Superior CPU , ASus G14 best for programming and heavy builds

1404 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $315Nvidia RTX 3060 $350Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $194Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback