Average Bench: 86.8% (57th of 1276)

Based on 152,024 user benchmarks.  Devices: BFEBFBFF000906EA, BFEBFBFF000906ED Model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-9400F CPU @ 2.90GHz

Intel’s Core i5-9400F is a hex-core 9th generation Coffee Lake desktop processor. It features base / boost clocks of 2.9 / 4.1 GHz, 9 MB of cache, a 65W TDP and it ships with a cooler but it does not have integrated graphics like the “non-F” variants. Although the 9400F is compatible with the enthusiast grade Z390 chipset it is normally paired with a better value for money B360 motherboard. At its launch the i5-9400F retailed for $180 but prices have dropped to the point ($135) that it now represents an excellent value proposition to gamers. Comparing the i5-9400F to the Ryzen 3600 shows that the 3600 is 8% better for quad-core processing but it costs 40% ($50) more than the 9400F. Ordinarily higher quad-core performance would result in better gaming but the Ryzen 3000 memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. Gamers can invest the $50 savings in a better GPU, for example by upgrading from a 2060S to a 2070S. Since the GPU makes the most difference to gaming, the end result is a system which offers far superior real world gaming performance for similar money. For those gamers who demand the best of the best, it is necessary to jump to one of the higher frequency SKUs such as the 9600K but for everyone else the i5-9400F offers unparalleled value. [Aug '19 CPUPro]

Poor: 76%Average: 86.8% Great: 92%
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Very good average bench

The Intel Core i5-9400F averaged just 13.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Intel Core i5-9400F near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 89.5Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 118Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Core i5-9400F is just 16.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Core i5-9400F performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 651Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 647Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 152,024 samples)
Min Avg Max
78.9 Memory 89.5 95.1
106 1-Core 118 125
212 2-Core 234 248
85.1% 147 Pts
Min Avg Max
384 4-Core 455 486
511 8-Core 647 708
71.4% 551 Pts
Min Avg Max
526 64-Core 651 710
43.7% 651 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Memory 95.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
91% 157 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 678
75% 577 Pts
64-Core 657
44% 657 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Memory 94.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
89% 153 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 710
76% 594 Pts
64-Core 708
48% 708 Pts
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Memory 94.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
89% 153 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 699
76% 589 Pts
64-Core 677
45% 677 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Memory 89.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
88% 153 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 721
78% 604 Pts
64-Core 720
48% 720 Pts
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Memory 89.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
88% 153 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 683
75% 581 Pts
64-Core 679
46% 679 Pts
152,024 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 36,111,041 CPUs tested.

 Prices

Approx. $182 @ launch in Feb '19
EbayUS $1537 mins
AmazonUS $1582 mins
BHPhotoUS $1653 months
OutletPCUS $1705 days
Send price feedback
Typical Core i5-9400F Builds (Compare 6,843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B365M DS3H - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $570

Popular Core i5-9400F compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Core™ i5-9400F Processor
Launch DateQ1'19
Processor Numberi5-9400F
# of Cores6
# of Threads6
Cache9 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set64-bit
Instruction Set ExtensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography14 nm
Clock Speed2.90 GHz
Max Turbo Frequency4.10 GHz
Bus Speed8 GT/s DMI3
Scalability1S Only
Max TDP65 W
Thermal Solution SpecificationPCG 2015C (65W)
Description“engineering new protections into hardware”

Memory

Max Memory Size128 GB
Memory TypesDDR4-2666
Memory Channels2
Memory Bandwidth41.6 GB/s
ECC Memory SupportedNo

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision3.0
PCI Express ConfigurationsUp to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4
Max # of PCI Express Lanes16

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes
Secure KeyYes

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost Tech2.0
Hyper-Threading TechNo
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
TSX-NINo
Identity Protection TechYes
Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)No

Package

Package Size37.5mm x 37.5mm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedFCLGA1151

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
OS GuardYes
Trusted Execution TechNo

 Comments

9th generation Coffee Lake processor...

Added 15 months ago.

Excellent

2 months ago.

cheap but has high performance, enough for video editing and gaming.


Poor

9 days ago.

this si better then ryszen 5 3600


Excellent

4 days ago.

Old and slow, and a bad platform.


Excellent

19 hrs ago.

Excellent processor for gaming (2020)


Good

31 mins ago.

best price per performace option


Poor

5 days ago.

When buying this it's like buying a beast and making intel is having loss in that.


Poor

5 days ago.

great performance for low price


Good

25 days ago.

Cheap and Quite fast for the price. plays all the Games i play without Lag. if playing only games its a much better option then an i7


Excellent

22 days ago.

I use him with a 2070s. No problem with any. I run games in 144hz 1440p.


Good

19 days ago.

value cpu, great for old gen gamers, like warcraft iiii, diablo ii (cant catch up w new gen games). i noe amd ryzen is the best in performance, but the design not attract me, especially the pin on cpu, make me worry.


Excellent

11 days ago.

my Ryzen 5 2600x outperforms this one in real world, not sure why the stats are waaay off on here


Excellent

1 month ago.

It's giving a good performance at a good price


Good

21 hrs ago.

Love it


Good

5 days ago.

better overall , only issue is multitasking


Poor

12 days ago.

Intel cpu security flaws and exploits


Good

15 months ago.


Excellent

16 days ago.

the AMD RYZEN R5-3400G was my old cpu and the Intel Core i5-9400F is the one i have now so i just wanted too see wich one is best.


Good

1 month ago.

userbenchmark has the big gaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee


Good

3 months ago.

Over 10% bottleneck with the rtx 2060s but over all it's pretty good


Average

19 hrs ago.

its just what i need, i can play overwatch on 150 fps on low settings and its all good if your playing overwatch only ( without google on or anything like that )


Excellent

2 months ago.

— I switched to Ryzen 3600 and it feels much better multi-tasking, without stuttering or drops of performance. Don't care about 5 FPS drop in games where I already had +150 FPS on EPIC settings if compared to intel. Ryzen all the WAY!


Excellent

15 hrs ago.

big pog


Excellent

1 month ago.

pro ands cons of ryzen processor


Excellent

27 days ago.

Excelente lo tengo con una rtx 2060 y se garcha todooo SI ESTAS EN DUDAS TE LO RECOMIENDO DE VERDAD SUPERO MIS EXPECTATIVAS LEJOS


Excellent

2 month ago.

best mid range cpu price x perf


Excellent

7 months ago.

really good but would be better with overclocking


Good

7 months ago.

Found a PC for $888 with this CPU and an RTX 2060 and I am planning to buy it, from the videos that I have watched on YouTube it looks like it's very good!


Excellent

9 months ago.

Overall cheap price with great results for non overclockers.


Good

17 months ago.

Good gaming capabilities if you don't want to overclock. If you do, i recommend the ryzen 5 3600 (or ryzen 3, when or if that comes out at the time of writing this)


Excellent

1 month ago.

itisveryfreakingnotveryawsomenesssupercalifragilesticexpicallidocious


Excellent

14 months ago.

best for budget gaming


Good

11 months ago.

Possesses very good value for budget gamers , 6 core 6 thread CPU with 2.9GHz base clock and 4.1GHz boost clock is enough for most games. Some users may worry low base clock but high boost clock compensates for it.


Excellent

17 months ago.

Insane price to performance!


Excellent

13 months ago.

over-hyped cpu


Excellent

13 months ago.

notbuy


Good

9 months ago.

While it's good for gaming, it might get hampered from future AAA games, where the Ryzen 5 3600 will shine better in.


Excellent

12 months ago.

Very good value for a 6 core processor if you cannot afford the i7-9700F.


Good

9 months ago.

It's actually a good processor for a budget build. I'd have preferred Ryzen over it for several reasons; but it's for those intel fans out there.


Excellent

19 months ago.

If you're looking for the best price to performance Intel CPU, this is the one. I had a GTX 1070 with this CPU and it was an overall well-balanced build. However, when I upgraded to a 1080 TI, the GPU was bottlenecked in some cases with the 9400F.


Average

16 months ago.

It's an acceptable CPU that doesn't seem to bottleneck the performance of most gaming systems. Not hyperthreaded, which would be awkward against the Ryzen 5 3600 of a similar pricing.


Terrible

17 months ago.

Weaker than everything.


Excellent

16 months ago.

A cheap, reliable beast. It's as much of a CPU as any gamer actually needs.


Excellent

16 months ago.

Better than all amd CPU's. No heating problem. On and cpu's you could rather cook an egg. Ninja gamer22 first check your ryzen series then comment. Duh ryzen 5 2600x or 7 1700 x doesnt support 128 GB ram while this thing does.


Terrible

12 months ago.

no longer price to performance king


Average

7 months ago.

Great budget gaming CPU, no on-board display and somewhat low boost clock speeds but my go-to suggestion for people without much money.


Excellent

10 months ago.

Really enjoy without buffering on Games and Workstation


Excellent

5 months ago.

good


Good

13 months ago.

Paired with a GTX 1660 Ti, runs all games @ 1080p, max settings, 60 fps. With the stock cooler. Probably going to upgrade to a Hyper 212 Evo Black, but it's not necessary in a well-ventilated case. Why pay for integrated graphics if you don't need them?


Excellent

15 months ago.

With the massive price drops it has gone through in my country, it's become a fantastic option for a new gaming PC build. Put the savings towards a better GPU!


Terrible

7 months ago.

Bad value


Good

6 months ago.

The 9400F is a good option for those looking to game at 1080p and have a limited budget or simply don’t need a powerful processor. It has better memory performance and better (if not equal) single, dual, quad, and hexa core performance than comparable Ryzen processors, among other things, while also being about $15 cheaper than the Ryzen 5 2600 (as of yesterday). That extra $15 can easily be put towards something like well rated aftermarket cooler.


Excellent

3 months ago.

Big bang for yr Buck


Excellent

20 months ago.

Best cost efficiency


Excellent

12 months ago.

100th percentile baby. good single core performance!


Good

10 months ago.

gud processor


Excellent

4 months ago.

For a $150, it makes sense for how well it does


Your
opinion?
1276 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback