TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel BX80677I57400

Core i5-7400

▲ 5412,792 ▼

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.0GHz, Kaby Lake.
Release date: Q1 2017.

Average Bench: 63.5% (540th of 1459)

Based on 234,266 user benchmarks.  Devices: BFEBFBFF000906E9, 0F8BFBFF000906E9, BFEBFBFF00010676 Model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz
Poor: 43%Average: 63.5% Great: 73%
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Popular builds with this CPU

Above average average bench

The Intel Core i5-7400 averaged 36.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 77.6Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 92.1Pts

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Core i5-7400 is 30.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Core i5-7400 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 307Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 303Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 234,266 samples)
Rank 54063.5%
Min Avg Max
44.6 Memory 77.6 90.4
67.8 1-Core 92.1 102
117 2-Core 180 203
67.2% 117 Pts
Min Avg Max
177 4-Core 284 355
211 8-Core 303 363
38.8% 294 Pts
Min Avg Max
203 64-Core 307 368
19% 307 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
76.1% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 199
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 389
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
72% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 196
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 378
51% 381 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
71.2% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 95
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 355
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
69.4% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 202
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 304
44% 320 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
65.7% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 180
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 292
37% 280 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
234,266 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,304,015 CPUs tested

 Prices

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

MSRP ≈ $190 @ launch in Jan '17
AmazonUS $7022 mins
BHPhotoUS $2055 years
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Core i5-7400 Builds (Compare 4,294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B250M BAZOOKA (MS-7A70) - $135

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel  $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples1,601x
GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples529x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples499x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples481x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples108x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston  $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples97x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples93x
RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL  $35Bench 71%, 98,777 samples152x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples134x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples95x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $459

Popular Core i5-7400 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Core™ i5-7400 Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz)
Code NameKaby Lake
Launch DateQ1'17
Processor Numberi5-7400
# of Cores4
# of Threads4
Cache6 MB
Instruction Set64-bit
Instruction Set ExtensionsSSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography14 nm
Recommended Price$182.00
Clock Speed3.00 GHz
Max Turbo Frequency3.50 GHz
Bus Speed8 GT/s DMI3
QPI Links0
Scalability1S Only
Max TDP65 W
Thermal Solution SpecificationPCG 2015C (65W)

Graphics

Processor GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics 630
Graphics Base Frequency350.00 MHz
# of Displays Supported3
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency1.00 GHz
Quick Sync VideoYes
InTru 3D TechYes
Clear Video HD TechYes
Clear Video Tech for MIDYes
Graphics Video Max Memory64 GB

Memory

Max Memory Size64 GB
Memory TypesDDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V
Memory Channels2
ECC Memory SupportedNo

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision3.0
PCI Express ConfigurationsUp to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4
Max # of PCI Express Lanes16

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes
Secure KeyYes

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost Tech2.0
TSX-NIYes
vPro TechNo
Identity Protection TechYes
Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)No

Package

Package Size37.5mm x 37.5mm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedFCLGA1151

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
OS GuardYes

 Comments

CPUPro
Avatar level
2,080

Official site ark.intel.com/...

Kaby Lake 7th generation Kaby Lake Core i5 processor...

Added 7 years ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
9,918

Good (edit your comment) Add link

4 months ago.

if it can run Halo Infinite with a good graphics card, then its good

GBR-User
Avatar level
5,828

Poor

2 months ago.

It's underwhelming, held me back constantly

TUR-User
Avatar level
5,548

Good

7 months ago.

I bought it brand new and it sucks

CAN-User
Avatar level
5,010

Poor

3 months ago.

I use it lol but I know there are way better ones

IND-User
Avatar level
4,830

Good

9 days ago.

I own this chip for for till now from 2018. It's been 5 years but works like a rock.

FRA-User
Avatar level
4,611

Poor

1 month ago.

It's my CPU and it's a good gaming processor

AUS-User
Avatar level
3,998

Good

3 months ago.

definitely not enough value for money against ryzen 5

MEX-User
Avatar level
3,756

Good

2 years ago.

price and for 7 fps difference not worth it i7 better i5 7400 way better

HUN-User
Avatar level
3,419

Good

2 months ago.

it is good for such as GTA V or Apex or R6, but not for Cyberpunk or anything like that

KOR-User
Avatar level
3,222

Poor

7 months ago.

its an i5 and it has intel turbo boost

SVK-User
Avatar level
2,472

Poor

11 months ago.

you can buy better for that price

DNK-User
Avatar level
2,226

Good

14 months ago.

Good for me, play all the games I throw at it, (funny my old 2500k do the same)

NZL-User
Avatar level
2,152

Poor

3 years ago.

Works fine for chrome, Csgo and minecraft, But it suffers in newer games Eg: Gta5, Rainbow six siege, Fallout 4 etc.

ARE-User
Avatar level
1,931

Poor

4 years ago.

IPC has greatly improved since the first gen. The only point where it's lacking is in it's number of core where it has only 2 cores and 4 threads.

AZE-User
Avatar level
1,406

Poor

4 years ago.

More expensive than Ryzen 3 and 5 CPUs, has worse performance than even Ryzen 3 2200G, has same or less cores and threads than Ryzen CPUs, overall inferior in every possible way imaginable.

CYP-User
Avatar level
1,364

Good

3 years ago.

expensive..... but it does the job

HND-User
Avatar level
964

Poor

3 years ago.

It's fast, economic and maybe isn't the best but is something to buy and be happy

yaabalfazl
Avatar level
92

Terrible

6 years ago.

some thread

evander321
Avatar level
50

Good

4 years ago.

Its still good for gaming but the i5 8400 is much better and performs like an i7 7700

krossblades
Avatar level
42

Poor

3 years ago.

With the price point in mind, I don't feel that a 4 core, 4 thread GPU at 3.0GHz should deserve more that 2-3 stars. It certainly gets the job done when browsing the internet and having another app or two open. The value of the chip is disappointing which sways my opinion on the i5 7400.

francesco_
Avatar level
18

Excellent

7 years ago.

bello e bravo

Promoter25
Avatar level
10

Poor

1 month ago.

Really bad even for GTX 1050 2GB

efejaya
Avatar level
8

Average

12 months ago.

Good for Windows 10.

lordofjava
Avatar level
6

Average

6 years ago.

Decent CPU, would have spent a little extra on a 7600k.

Sadiq04
Avatar level
4

Poor

4 years ago.

More expensive than all Ryzen 3 and 5 CPUs, has less performance than Ryzen 2200G (which costs 80$), has the same/higher amount of cores and threads, overall inferior to Ryzen CPUs in every way - A Ryzen Fanboy

BIGBAMQ
Avatar level
4

Excellent

14 months ago.

i use it in my spare rig with a 1660 super and a z170x gaming 7 gigabyte mobo and it functions well. my main rig is a i7 4790k @ 4.9 and a 1070ti 8gb both on water and it performs way better.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 7 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs Intel Core i7-13700K
vs Intel Core i5-12400
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

1459 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback