IntelBX80646G3430
IntelFH8068003067416

2 Cores, 2 Threads @3.3GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q3 2013.

  

2 Cores, 2 Threads @2.00 GHz, Gemini Lake.
Release date ≈ Q1 2018.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,835 user samples
263 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 63% Base clock 3.3 GHz
Worst Bench: 43% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 43% Great: 63%
SPEED RANK: 660th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
1,572 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 34% Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 19% Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 19% Great: 34%
SPEED RANK: 1370th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
56.5 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+100%
28.3 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
84.2 Pts Hugely lower memory latency.
+112%
39.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
89.5 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+70%
52.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
167 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+73%
96.6 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
170 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+72%
98.9 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
172 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+70%
101 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
93.8 Pts Hugely lower OC memory latency.
+95%
48.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
98.2 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+63%
60.3 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
195 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+67%
117 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
194 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+66%
117 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
195 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+67%
117 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,125,310 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
50 % 50 %
Age
Newest
129 Months 74+ Months Much more recent.
+43%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
195 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+68%
116 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
174 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+74%
99.8 Pts
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'13 Q4'17
Cache
Cache
3 MB SmartCache 4 MB
Lithography
Lithography
22 nm 14 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$86.00 - $93.00 $107.00
Thermal Solution Specification
Thermal Solution Specification
PCG 2013C 105 deg C
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
32 GB 8 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s
ECC Memory Supported
ECC Memory Supported ‡
Yes No
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics Intel® UHD Graphics 600
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
350 MHz 250 MHz
Graphics Output
Graphics Output
eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI/VGA eDP/DP/HDMI/MIPI-DSI
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
1.1 GHz 700 MHz
Graphics Video Max Memory
Graphics Video Max Memory
1.7 GB 8 GB
Package Size
Package Size
37.5mm x 37.5mm 25mm x 24mm
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡
No Yes
AES New Instructions
Intel® AES New Instructions
No Yes
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
Up to 3.0 2.0
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
16 6

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

The G3430 is a 2013 Haswell based CPU and is part of Intel's value range of Pentium processors. The Pentium-G range have very strong single and dual core performance but lag the group leaders in terms of multi-core processing (MCP). MCP is important for tasks such as audio/video encoding and software development. For regular PC use such as surfing the web, watching movies and playing the vast majority of games, MCP is not required. The G3430 currently retails for a quarter as much as a 4770K but has an effective speed of 79.1 which is just 6% lower than the average of the current group leaders. The majority of users will notice no difference even by paying five times more for a top end processor. The G3430 is brilliant value but its sibling, the G3420, is cheaper and even better value for money.  [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback