Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC7JYB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel(R) NUC7CJYH
MotherboardIntel NUC7JYB  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '21 at 08:33
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Memory 23.2
1-Core 46
2-Core 94.6
29% 54.6 Pts
4-Core 85.3
8-Core 66.7
11% 76 Pts
64-Core 73.9
5% 73.9 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2072) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.28% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 2.4
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.1
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.28%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
652GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SHM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 68 84 74 79 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 113
Write 59.5
Mixed 10.4
SusWrite 65.2
45% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0
27% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SK_Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Crucial CB4GS2666.C8GT 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 4.3
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 298
13% 298 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 16%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7JYB Builds (Compare 286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7JYB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $23
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback