Today's hottest deals

Asrock J4005M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock J4005M  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 19:39
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4005
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 47
1-Core 58.7
2-Core 118
42% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 117
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 1TB
574GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 270 219 205 116 188 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 149 172 172 164 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 121
Write 121
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 168
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.7
193% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83%
Great: 114%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
4GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.3 13 6.9 7 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 87.4
Write 2.7
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 7.9
26% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD44G266641 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.3% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J4005M Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4005M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback