Intel
AMD100-100000593WOF
  

2 Cores, 4 Threads @2.30 GHz, 15 W.
Release date ≈ Q1 2019.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 7,041 user samples
2,782 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 31% Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 31% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 856th / 1457
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
4,259 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 120% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 98% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 98% Great: 120%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 1457
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
48.5 % 110 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+127%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
67.8 Pts 81.9 Pts Lower memory latency.
+21%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
61.5 Pts 201 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+227%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
112 Pts 393 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+251%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
170 Pts 743 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+337%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
173 Pts 1145 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+562%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
82.7 Pts 92.6 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+12%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
72.6 Pts 214 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+195%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
135 Pts 427 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+216%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
200 Pts 822 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+311%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
200 Pts 1259 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+530%
Market Share
Based on 68,220,484 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.32 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,100%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 82 % Much more popular.
+61%
Age
Newest
63+ Months 21 Months Much more recent.
+67%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
200 Pts 1498 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+649%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
174 Pts 1414 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+713%
ADVERTISEMENT

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback