Today's hottest deals
Intel
IntelBX80648I75820K

2 Cores, @3.16 GHz, Wolfdale.
Release date ≤ Q4 2013.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.3GHz, Haswell-E.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 120,535 user samples
18,841 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 48% Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 28% Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 28% Great: 48%
SPEED RANK: 1035th / 1464
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
101,694 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 297th / 1464
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
41.9 % 76.8 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+84%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
69.5 Pts 86.4 Pts Lower memory latency.
+24%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
45.2 Pts 96.3 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+113%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
83.3 Pts 192 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+130%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
85.2 Pts 364 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+327%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
87.5 Pts 594 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+579%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
80 Pts 94 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+18%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
51.2 Pts 120 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+134%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
101 Pts 237 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+135%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
101 Pts 462 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+357%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
101 Pts 737 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+630%
Market Share
Based on 68,801,920 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.17 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,600%
Value
Value For Money
54 % 94.7 % Much better value.
+75%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 66 % More popular.
+25%
Price
Price (score)
$110 Cheaper.
+15%
$130
Age
Newest
130+ Months 122 Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
102 Pts 933 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+815%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
86.8 Pts 748 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+762%
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q1'08 Q3'14
Cache
Cache
6 MB L2 15 MB SmartCache
Lithography
Lithography
45 nm 22 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$200.00 $389.00 - $396.00
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
1333 MHz FSB 0 GT/s
Package Size
Package Size
37.5mm x 37.5mm 52.5mm x 45.0mm
Turbo Boost Tech
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology ‡
No 2.0
Hyper-Threading Tech
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡
No Yes
AES New Instructions
Intel® AES New Instructions
No Yes
Trusted Execution Tech
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡
Yes No

More specs » More specs »

Beast processor during its time, when single core performance was king, but also software support, starting with Windows itself, was a major factor, it's crazy because all the benches at the time showed the e8500 beating the Phenom II 965 in gaming( the reason I was building a system) at the time, especially when it came to OC. Crazy what the benches are now, if you have Phenom II now with a mobo that works it may be useful (but they aren't very power efficient) but I burnt my mobo out overclocking so the point of what either processor could do 5 much less 10 years later is pretty moot. [Feb '21 qnytech1]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i7-5820K is the cheapest of three (5820K,5930K,5960X) new Haswell-E prosumer/enthusiast processors. The 5820K sports six physical cores and twelve threads which allow for enormous processing throughput. Unfortunately Intel have somewhat handicapped the 5820K by setting its base clock at just 3.3 GHz, 0.7GHz lower than the class leading 4790K. Comparing the 4790K and 5820K shows that the cheaper i7-4790K is significantly faster at both single and dual threaded workloads. The additional two cores found in the 5820K are not relevant to general computing and as such the 5820K probably makes a better server rather than consumer proposition. The Haswell-E X99 architecture also requires DDR4 RAM which is currently far more expensive than DDR3. Overall the 5820K is a very expensive option and probably best avoided by the vast majority of consumers.  [Sep '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback