Average Bench: 41.9% (1023rd of 1452)

Based on 18,841 user benchmarks.  Devices: BFEBFBFF0001067A, BFEBFBFF00010676, , BFEFFBFF0001067A, AFEBFBFF0001067A Model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8500 @ 3.16GHz

Below average average bench

The Intel Core2 Duo E8500 averaged 58.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. Memory Latency 69.5Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 45.2Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Core2 Duo E8500 is 20.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Core2 Duo E8500 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. Multi Core Speed 86.8Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 87.5Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 18,841 samples)
Min Avg Max
44.1 Memory 69.5 80
25.4 1-Core 45.2 51.2
44 2-Core 83.3 101
42.9% 66 Pts
Min Avg Max
48.7 4-Core 85.2 101
55.3 8-Core 87.5 101
11.5% 86.4 Pts
Min Avg Max
51.1 64-Core 86.8 102
5.4% 86.8 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 76.7
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 94.6
47% 73.3 Pts
4-Core 95.1
8-Core 95.2
13% 95.1 Pts
64-Core 94.4
6% 94.4 Pts
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 74.3
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 88.4
46% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 90.5
8-Core 91.9
12% 91.2 Pts
64-Core 90.4
6% 90.4 Pts
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 71.6
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 87.3
44% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 88.3
8-Core 90.3
12% 89.3 Pts
64-Core 88.4
6% 88.4 Pts
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 71.4
1-Core 43.3
2-Core 84.5
43% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 83.6
8-Core 84.7
11% 84.1 Pts
64-Core 81.8
5% 81.8 Pts
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 69.6
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 90.6
44% 69.6 Pts
4-Core 90.8
8-Core 84.6
12% 87.7 Pts
64-Core 77.3
5% 77.3 Pts
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 73.2
1-Core 45.5
2-Core 59.7
42% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 59.1
8-Core 83.1
9% 71.1 Pts
64-Core 81.4
5% 81.4 Pts
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 64.4
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 95.1
43% 69.3 Pts
4-Core 94.7
8-Core 96.1
13% 95.4 Pts
64-Core 95.6
6% 95.6 Pts
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 70.4
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 42.8
38% 52 Pts
4-Core 45.3
8-Core 45
6% 45.2 Pts
64-Core 42.9
3% 42.9 Pts
18,841 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,074,906 CPUs tested


If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

AmazonUS $11012 mins
Send price feedback
Typical Core2 Duo E8500 Builds (Compare 5,636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $138

Popular Core2 Duo E8500 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.



DescriptionIntel® Core™2 Duo Processor E8500 (6M Cache, 3.16 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB)
Code NameWolfdale
Launch DateQ1'08
Processor NumberE8500
# of Cores2
Cache6 MB L2
Instruction Set64-bit
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography45 nm
VID Voltage Range0.8500V-1.3625V
Recommended Price$200.00
Clock Speed3.16 GHz
Bus Speed1333 MHz FSB
Max TDP65 W
FSB ParityNo

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsNo

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost TechNo
Hyper-Threading TechNo
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
Demand Based SwitchingNo


Package Size37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets SupportedLGA775
Processing Die Size107 mm2
# of Processing Die Transistors410 million

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
Trusted Execution TechYes


Added n/a ago.


2 years ago.

fast enough, reliable, value 4 money (now)


2 years ago.

Never failed or disappointed me.


5 years ago.

Reliable. Good overclock capability.


3 years ago.

i play games with this prossessor


3 years ago.

Beast processor during its time, when single core performance was king, but also software support, starting with Windows itself, was a major factor, it's crazy because all the benches at the time showed the e8500 beating the Phenom II 965 in gaming( the reason I was building a system) at the time, especially when it came to OC. Crazy what the benches are now, if you have Phenom II now with a mobo that works it may be useful (but they aren't very power efficient) but I burnt my mobo out overclocking so the point of what either processor could do 5 much less 10 years later is pretty moot.


17 months ago.

depending on your country's computer market and how you actually got the processor (standalone or in a dell/hp etc.). It is a surprisingly good processor especially as an upgrade from older Core 2 CPU's the difference in framerate for more demanding games is incredibly high especially compared to its predecessors. From personal experience, I spent about 2-3 dollars (AUD) for this processor and easily got double the framerate in Team Fortress 2. At the time and even currently I only play a few relatively undemanding games such as TF2 and HOI4. For more CPU reliant games like GTA V however it's okay but it stutters a lot more due to it only having two cores and a relatively low cache compared to more modern processors. Overall, as part of $150 PC it lasted me at least 2 years until I upgraded to a T470s for about the same price.

1452 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback