IntelBX80684I99900K
AMDZen 4 Hype Train

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.6GHz, Coffee Lake.
Release date: Q4 2018.

  

Release date ≈ Q3 2022.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 354,231 user samples
354,223 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 89% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 89% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 89th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
8 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 121% Base clock 5.4 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 88% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 88% Great: 121%
SPEED RANK: 57th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
97.9 % 105 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
93.1 Pts Lower memory latency.
+16%
80.5 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
142 Pts 186 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+31%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
281 Pts 366 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+30%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
551 Pts 692 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+26%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
981 Pts 1073 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+9%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
97.2 Pts +5% 92.9 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
153 Pts 209 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+37%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
305 Pts 409 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+34%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
604 Pts 804 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+33%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1116 Pts 1234 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+11%
Market Share
Based on 67,774,539 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.31 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
86 % Much more popular.
+62%
53 %
Age
Newest
66 Months 20+ Months Much more recent.
+70%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1590 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+8%
1477 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1451 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+9%
1336 Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel i9-9900K is an 8 core, 16 thread, unlocked 9th generation Coffee Lake processor. It has a base / boost clocks of 3.6 / 4.7 GHz and a single-core boost of 5.0 GHz (the highest frequency achieved yet from this class of Intel CPU). It features 16 MB of cache, a 95W TDP and Intel UHD 630 graphics. The 9900K is compatible with the new Z390 chipset, and subject to a BIOS update, is also compatible with the older Z370 chipset. Aimed at users who do not wish to compromise, the i9-9900K offers the best gaming and desktop experience available at any price. Heavy workstation users should consider the Ryzen 9 3900X which is similarly priced. Comparing the overclocked 3900X shows that it is just 10% worse for gaming and desktop (sub octa-core) but around 40% better for 64-core computations. Gamers should consider the 9700K which offers identical overclocked gaming performance at a $100 USD discount. [Oct '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Within minutes of this unrealistic, pre-release, result appearing on userbenchmark, AMD’s marketing machinery declared a 20% victory over the 12900K whilst simultaneously slandering userbenchmark via hundreds of “news” outlets and thousands of supposedly disinterested twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices because AMD completely dominates “news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department permanently asleep at the wheel, If these practices continue, Ryzen may eventually end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Jun ’22 Steam stats) is just 2%. Meanwhile, Nvidia’s RTX 2060 alone accounts for 5%. If Zen 4 actually delivers anywhere near a 57% real-world single core uplift, we will bow down, call AMD king, and commit seppuku! AMD’s new architecture is, once again, optimized to shine in specific benchmarks. Realistically, even if Zen 4 only catches Intel's 12th gen. (Alder Lake) in a handful of real-world scenarios, it will be a big step forward for AMD. A few weeks after Zen 4 (est. Sep 27), Intel’s 13th gen. (Raptor Lake) is scheduled to launch. Smart shoppers will do well to wait until then, before considering a purchase. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire the speed of their technical progress. AMD-Raptor-4 and Intel-Zen-13 would be better fitting product names. [Jul '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback