Today's hottest deals
IntelBX8070811900K
AMD100-100000063WOF

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.5GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen3.
Release date: Q4 2020.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
306 EFps 318 EFps +4%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
109 EFps +1% 108 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
146 EFps +3% 142 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
147 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+11%
133 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
136 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+12%
121 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 133,582 user samples
44,319 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 94% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 94% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 78th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
89,263 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 110% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 84% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Poor: 84% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 106th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
103 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+5%
97.9 %
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
AoE4 6%, FarC6 11%, WatchDL 13%, RDR2 4% 1 % Forza5 2%, Bord3 2%, BFV 5%, CPunk 1%, EldenR 1%, Civ6 6%, CSGO 24%, DoomE 2%
20 Oct22|Tweakers
Intel 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake Re...
3 % FarC6 3%, F122 6%, TWarW3 13% RDR2 2%, MetroEx 3%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
87.4 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
81.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
171 Pts +3% 166 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
333 Pts +3% 324 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
638 Pts +4% 613 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1114 Pts +4% 1068 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
95.6 Pts +4% 92.3 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
183 Pts +2% 179 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
360 Pts +1% 357 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
700 Pts +1% 693 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1279 Pts 1328 Pts +4%
Market Share
Based on 68,910,427 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.44 % 0.67 % Much higher market share.
+52%
Value
Value For Money
105 % 114 % Slightly better value.
+9%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
75 % 89 % More popular.
+19%
Price
Price (score)
$265 $158 Much cheaper.
+40%
Age
Newest
43 Months Slightly more recent.
+9%
47 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 Watts 105 Watts More energy efficient.
+16%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 16 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.5 GHz 3.8 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+9%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+13%
4.7 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1734 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+7%
1614 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1600 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+9%
1462 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Rocket Lake Zen3
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1200 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 750 None

The i9-11900K is the fastest CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S lineup which brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) and 50% stronger integrated graphics. There are also 500 series chipset improvements including: 20 PCIe4 CPU lanes (up from 16) and USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps up from 10 Gbps). Rocket Lake’s IPC uplift translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 7 5800X is one of four new processors from AMD’s latest range of Zen 3 CPUs. The new architecture is more power efficient than Zen 2 and also yields significant performance improvements. All four new CPUs have the ‘X’ nomenclature, indicating that they are tuned to their maximum clock speeds out-of-box. The 5800X has 8 cores and 16 threads with base/boost clock speeds of 3.8/4.7 GHz, 36 MB of cache and a 105W TDP. At $449 USD, the 5800X is relatively expensive, but it still offers far better value than the 5900X. A 500 series motherboard is recommended but the new Zen 3 CPUs will work with most 400 series motherboard following a BIOS update (expected in Q1 2021). At AMD’s launch presentation, they said they finally had the best CPUs for gaming. Our benchmarks show that the 5800X is comparable to Intel’s $175 USD 11400F. Gamers that do not wish to pay “marketing fees” can invest those savings in a better GPU which will produce an unquestionably faster gaming PC. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback