IntelBX8070811900K
AMD100-100000061WOF
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
306 EFps 318 EFps +4%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
109 EFps +1% 108 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
146 EFps +3% 142 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
147 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+11%
133 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
136 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+12%
121 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 116,997 user samples
35,456 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 89% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 89% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 25th / 1369
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
81,541 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 78% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 78% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 1369
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
103 % +4% 99.1 %
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
AoE4 5%, FarC6 10%, WatchDL 13%, RDR2 2% 3 % Forza5 2%, Bord3 2%, BFV 5%, CPunk 2%, EldenR 2%, Civ6 20%, CSGO 27%, DoomE 2%
20 Oct22|Tweakers
Intel 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake Re...
2 % F122 6%, TWarW3 11% FarC6 5%, RDR2 2%, MetroEx 2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
87.8 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
82.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
171 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+6%
162 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
332 Pts +3% 321 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
635 Pts +2% 620 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1105 Pts 1154 Pts +4%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
96.1 Pts +1% 94.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
184 Pts +2% 181 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
360 Pts +0% 359 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
701 Pts +0% 700 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1266 Pts 1350 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+7%
Market Share
Based on 57,296,628 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.47 % 0.57 % Higher market share.
+21%
Value
Value For Money
95.4 % +2% 93.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
75 % +4% 72 %
Price
Price (score)
$370 $340 Slightly cheaper.
+8%
Age
Newest
20 Months More recent.
+20%
25 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 Watts 105 Watts More energy efficient.
+16%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 12 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 24 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.5 GHz 3.7 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+6%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+10%
4.8 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1732 Pts 2315 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+34%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1587 Pts 2061 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+30%
Series
CPU Architecture
Rocket Lake Zen3
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1200 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 750 None
ADVERTISEMENT

The i9-11900K is the fastest CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S lineup which brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) and 50% stronger integrated graphics. There are also 500 series chipset improvements including: 20 PCIe4 CPU lanes (up from 16) and USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps up from 10 Gbps). Rocket Lake’s IPC uplift translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 9 5900X is second in AMD’s line-up of new Zen 3 CPUs. The 12-core hyper-threaded processor has base/boost clock speeds of 3.7/4.8 GHz, a 70 MB cache and a TDP of 105W. The 5900X took center stage in the 5000 series launch presentation where AMD gunned for Intel’s “best gaming CPU” crown. They showed the 5900X as being 26% better for gaming than the previous generation’s Ryzen 9 3900XT, attributing this to the new architecture’s faster single core speeds and lower latency. AMD also stated that the 5900X achieves, on average, 6.8% faster gaming performance than Intel’s 10-core i9-10900K. The details around AMD’s testing were not disclosed but it is safe to assume that 6.8% is the highest average lead that AMD are willing to stand by. Our benchmarks show that the 5900X’s slightly faster cores and the 10900K’s slightly lower memory latency balance out to yield similar performance. Whilst presenting their figures, AMD admitted that their 3000 series CPUs were far from “best for gaming” and conceded that the 10900K is approximately 19% faster than the 3900XT (our effective speed marks the gap at just 14%). Despite this clear performance deficiency, AMD supported 3000 series sales with an aggressive and successful marketing campaign to easily outsell Intel over the last 12 months. Given the real performance uplift observed in the 5000 series, and the absence of any meaningful marketing from Intel, we expect CPU sales to shift even further in AMD’s favour. Gamers that do not wish to pay “marketing fees” should investigate Intel’s $175 USD 11400F, the $660 USD savings would be far better spent on a higher tier GPU. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $480Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $167Nvidia RTX 3070 $530Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $322Nvidia RTX 3050 $300Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $53SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback