IntelBX8070811400F
AMD100-100000063WOF
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
259 EFps 318 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+23%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
106 EFps 108 EFps +2%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
142 EFps 142 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
134 EFps +1% 133 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
131 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+8%
121 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 202,579 user samples
25,554 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 102% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 83% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 83% Great: 102%
SPEED RANK: 58th / 1358
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
177,025 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 107% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 85% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 85% Great: 107%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 1358
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
94.1 % 96.5 % +2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
87 Pts +2% 85.1 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
148 Pts 159 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+7%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
287 Pts 311 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+8%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
544 Pts 577 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+6%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
882 Pts 1058 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+20%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
95.4 Pts +1% 94.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
155 Pts 171 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+10%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
308 Pts 338 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+10%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
599 Pts 652 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+9%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
951 Pts 1171 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+23%
Market Share
Based on 54,508,139 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.4 % 1.25 % Hugely higher market share.
+212%
Value
Value For Money
112 % Better value.
+18%
94.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
92 % Slightly more popular.
+7%
86 %
Price
Price (score)
$150 Much cheaper.
+50%
$300
Age
Newest
16 Months More recent.
+24%
21 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads 16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
2.6 GHz 3.8 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+46%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.4 GHz 4.7 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+7%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1164 Pts 1774 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+52%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1102 Pts 1636 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+48%
Series
CPU Architecture
Rocket Lake Zen3
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1200 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Rocket Lake i5-11400F paired with a B560 motherboard and 3200 RAM ($365 USD) offers unprecedented value for money to gamers. It completely prices AMD's 5000 series out of the market. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 7 5800X is one of four new processors from AMD’s latest range of Zen 3 CPUs. The new architecture is more power efficient than Zen 2 and also yields significant performance improvements. All four new CPUs have the ‘X’ nomenclature, indicating that they are tuned to their maximum clock speeds out-of-box. The 5800X has 8 cores and 16 threads with base/boost clock speeds of 3.8/4.7 GHz, 36 MB of cache and a 105W TDP. At $449 USD, the 5800X is relatively expensive, but it still offers far better value than the 5900X. A 500 series motherboard is recommended but the new Zen 3 CPUs will work with most 400 series motherboard following a BIOS update (expected in Q1 2021). At AMD’s launch presentation, they said they finally had the best CPUs for gaming. Our benchmarks show that the 5800X is comparable to Intel’s $175 USD 11400F. Gamers that do not wish to pay “marketing fees” can invest those savings in a better GPU which will produce an unquestionably faster gaming PC. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $275Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $470Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $535Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $350Nvidia RTX 3050 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $449SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback