Today's hottest deals
IntelBX80648I75960X
AMD100-100000651WOF

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.0GHz, Haswell-E.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 38,716 user samples
15,468 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 70% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 70% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 247th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
23,248 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 111% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 91% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 91% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 74th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
80.5 % 104 % Faster effective speed.
+30%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
87 Pts 95.5 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+10%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
100 Pts 158 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+58%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
201 Pts 313 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+56%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
398 Pts 606 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+52%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
718 Pts 1088 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+52%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
95.3 Pts 99.5 Pts +4%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
128 Pts 166 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+30%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
254 Pts 331 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+30%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
502 Pts 656 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+31%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
920 Pts 1267 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+38%
Market Share
Based on 68,932,026 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.02 % 0.33 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,550%
Value
Value For Money
89.5 % 99 % Better value.
+11%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
56 % 64 % More popular.
+14%
Price
Price (score)
$189 Much cheaper.
+44%
$335
Age
Newest
123 Months 31+ Months Much more recent.
+75%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1353 Pts 1547 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+14%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1075 Pts 1432 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+33%

The Intel 5960X sports eight cores and sixteen threads. That's two more cores than we have ever seen on a consumer processor before and as such this $1,000 processor offers record breaking multi-threaded CPU horsepower. Unfortunately the 5960X is clocked at just 3 GHz base and 3.5 GHz turbo which, for single and dual-core workloads, renders it around 15% slower than a $69 G3258 on stock clocks! The 5960X is only compatible with Intel's new X99 chipset which requires new DDR4 RAM and is currently far more expensive, with little consumer benefit, than DDR3. All in all the i7-5960X processor is largely irrelevant for consumers as it's far far too expensive. [Sep '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 5800X3D has the same core architecture as the 5800X but it runs at 11% lower base and 4% lower boost clocks. The lower clocks are in exchange for an extra 64MB of cache (96MB up from 32MB) and around 40% more money. For most real-world tasks performance is comparable to the 5800X. Cache sensitive scenarios such as low res. canned game benchmarks with a 3090-Ti ($2,000 USD) benefit at the cost of everything else. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins, conveniently ignore frame drops and gloss over the losses. Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. Instead of focusing on real-world performance, AMD’s marketers aim to dupe consumers with bankrolled headlines. The same tactics were used with the Radeon 5000 series GPUs. Zen 4 needs to bring substantial IPC improvements for all workloads, rather than overpriced "3D" marketing gimmicks. New PC builders have little reason to look further than the $260 12600K which, at a fraction of the price, offers better all round performance in gaming, desktop and workstation applications. Users with an existing AM4 build should wait just a few more months for better performance at lower prices with Raptor Lake or even Zen 4. The marketers selling expensive “3D” upgrades today will quickly move onto Zen 4 (3D) leaving unfortunate buyers stuck on an overpriced, 6 year old, dead-end, platform. [Mar '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback