Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '22 at 16:39
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$211
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 129
2-Core 260
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 1,025
91% 771 Pts
64-Core 1,358
84% 1,358 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1805 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S211028
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 389 400 417 406 415 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 418
Mixed 427
SusWrite 400
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 34.8
126% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 225
173% 232 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 92%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
573GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 127 127 127 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 107
Write 111
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 127
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMR16GX4M2D3000C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMR16GX4M2C3000C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMR16GX4M2C3000C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 64GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
114% Outstanding
MC Read 48.5
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 41.6
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 23.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 64%
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 57%

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $484
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback