COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80646I74770K
AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
▲ 6513,807 ▼

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.5GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q1 2013.

VS
▲ 698,480 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

Effective Speed 
+3%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 331,964 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
172,887 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 84% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 60% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
Poor: 60% Great: 84%
SPEED RANK: 346th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
159,077 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 61% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 61% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 319th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		73.6 % 75.7 % +3%
External Data: 1080p 
+22%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review 		22 % Hitm2 23%, FarC5 28%, StrangeB 6%, TWarW2 30%, SotTR 18%, ACO 41%, MetroEx 9%, MESoW 18%, Divis2 29%
Average Score 
+15%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		85.6 Pts Lower memory latency.
+14% 		75.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		101 Pts 113 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+12%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		192 Pts 219 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+14%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		334 Pts 409 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+22%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		497 Pts 708 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+42%
Overclocked Score 
+15%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		96 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11% 		86.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		122 Pts 128 Pts +5%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		232 Pts 254 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+9%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		403 Pts 499 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+24%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		609 Pts 911 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+50%
Value & Sentiment 
+5%
Market Share
Based on 69,019,971 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.2 % 0.28 % Much higher market share.
+40%
Value
Value For Money 		106 % Better value.
+18% 		89.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		65 % 69 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
Price
Price (score) 		$75 Much cheaper.
+50% 		$150
Nice To Haves 
+56%
Age
Newest 		140 Months 78 Months Much more recent.
+44%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		84 Watts More energy efficient.
+20% 		105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		8 threads 16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		22 nm 12 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+45%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.5 GHz 3.7 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+6%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3.9 GHz 4.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+10%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		620 Pts 1,276 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+106%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		513 Pts 1,096 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+114%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Haswell Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1150 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 4600 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 73.6%
Average Bench 75.7%

The Core i7-4770K is Intel's fourth generation (codename Haswell) flagship processor in the hugely successful Core range. It's not surprising that the 4770K sets a new Real World Performance index record, besting its predecessor by just over 9%. The 4770K also tops out in the remainder of our benchmarks setting new highs of 10020 and 2164 in the PassMark and PassMark Single Thread tests which equates to roughly an 8% overall performance increase over the 3770K. With a TDP of 84 watts, power consumption has increased slightly over the 3770K. The new Core i7-4770K demonstrates around an 8% performance increase over its predecessor the 3770K but it costs 12% more. As a result, at least until prices drop, this processor represents marginally worse value for money than the 3770K. [Jun '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
172,887
159,077
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback