IntelBX80684I59400F
AMDYD2600BBAFBOX
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+18%
198 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
107 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+11%
96 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps +2% 135 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
123 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+9%
113 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
130 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+13%
115 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 715,194 user samples
173,718 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 73% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 73% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 61st / 1276
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
541,476 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 86% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 66% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 66% Great: 86%
SPEED RANK: 163rd / 1276
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
86.2 % Faster effective speed.
+12%
77.1 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
89.4 Pts Lower memory latency.
+13%
79.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
117 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+7%
109 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
232 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+9%
213 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
451 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+12%
403 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
639 Pts 668 Pts +5%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
94.9 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+8%
87.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
124 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+5%
118 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
247 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+5%
235 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
486 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+6%
459 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
708 Pts 766 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+8%
Market Share
Based on 38,944,030 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.29 % 2.33 % Hugely higher market share.
+81%
Value
Value For Money
103 % Better value.
+20%
86.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
85 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
78 %
Price
Price (score)
$145 Cheaper.
+22%
$186
Age
Newest
23 Months Much more recent.
+30%
33 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts 65 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
6 threads 12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 12 nm Newer manufacturing.
+14%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
2.9 GHz 3.4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+17%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.1 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+5%
3.9 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
709 Pts 995 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+40%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
645 Pts 878 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+36%
Series
CPU Architecture
Coffee Lake Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

Intel’s Core i5-9400F is a hex-core 9th generation Coffee Lake desktop processor. It features base / boost clocks of 2.9 / 4.1 GHz, 9 MB of cache, a 65W TDP and it ships with a cooler but it does not have integrated graphics like the “non-F” variants. Although the 9400F is compatible with the enthusiast grade Z390 chipset it is normally paired with a better value for money B360 motherboard. At its launch the i5-9400F retailed for $180 but prices have dropped to the point ($135) that it now represents an excellent value proposition to gamers. Comparing the i5-9400F to the Ryzen 3600 shows that the 3600 is 8% better for quad-core processing but it costs 40% ($50) more than the 9400F. Ordinarily higher quad-core performance would result in better gaming but the Ryzen 3000 memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. Gamers can invest the $50 savings in a better GPU, for example by upgrading from a 2060S to a 2070S. Since the GPU makes the most difference to gaming, the end result is a system which offers far superior real world gaming performance for similar money. For those gamers who demand the best of the best, it is necessary to jump to one of the higher frequency SKUs such as the 9600K but for everyone else the i5-9400F offers unparalleled value. [Aug '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. Even though the 2600 is plausible for multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback