Intel
AMDFD8350FRHKBOX
  

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.4 GHz, Ivy Bridge.
Release date ≤ Q4 2013.

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.0GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 418,054 user samples
104,858 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 75% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 50% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 50% Great: 75%
SPEED RANK: 508th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
313,196 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 576th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
65.1 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
60.8 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
80.9 Pts 81 Pts +0%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
89.3 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+39%
64.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
175 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+43%
122 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
284 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+29%
221 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
304 Pts 341 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+12%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92.6 Pts +1% 91.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
98.8 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+35%
73.3 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
196 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+37%
143 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
354 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+39%
254 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
361 Pts 397 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+10%
Market Share
Based on 67,964,647 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.14 % Much higher market share.
+75%
0.08 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
56 % 57 % +2%
Age
Newest
125+ Months More recent.
+10%
139 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
364 Pts 411 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+13%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
307 Pts 353 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+15%
ADVERTISEMENT

good processor, still remains reliable [Oct '17 Mojaradim]

MORE DETAILS

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback