Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z77P-D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77P-D3  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 09:28
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 375
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 1.1
3% 3.23 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R3C0F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 274 269 276 285 285 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 359
Write 286
Mixed 248
SusWrite 278
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 30.1
102% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 27.8
DQ Write 72.2
DQ Mixed 38.2
33% 46.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 99%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2013)-$49
365GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 105 106 104 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 98
Write 101
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 105
71% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 99P5474-013.A00LF 99U5584-010.A00LF 99P5474-013.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.7% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77P-D3 Builds (Compare 792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77P-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback