Intel
$225
Intel
 $225 

2 Cores, 4 Threads @1.7GHz, Ivy Bridge.
Release date: Q1 2012.

  

4 Cores, 8 Threads @1.70 GHz, Kaby Lake R.
Release date ≈ Q4 2017.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 46,656 user samples
26,848 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% Base clock 1.7 GHz
Worst Bench: 29% Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 29% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 881st / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
19,808 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 24% Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 24% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 755th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
47.2 % 51.6 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
71.7 Pts Lower memory latency.
+22%
58.9 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
53.9 Pts 80.4 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+49%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
91.9 Pts 150 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+63%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
134 Pts 244 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+82%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
138 Pts 335 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+143%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.8 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+10%
79.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
68 Pts 107 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+57%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
118 Pts 212 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+80%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
165 Pts 362 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+119%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
165 Pts 493 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+199%
Market Share
Based on 67,977,438 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.17 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,600%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
52 % 54 % +4%
Age
Newest
147 Months 78+ Months Much more recent.
+47%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
166 Pts 488 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+194%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
139 Pts 335 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+141%
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q2'12 Q3'17
Cache
Cache
3 MB SmartCache 6 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
AVX SSE4.1/4.2, AVX2
Lithography
Lithography
22 nm 14 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$225.00 $297.00
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz 3.60 GHz
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
5 GT/s DMI 4 GT/s OPI
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
25.6 GB/s 34.1 GB/s
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Intel® UHD Graphics 620
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
350 MHz 300 MHz
Graphics Output
Graphics Output
eDP/DP/HDMI/SDVO/CRT eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
1.05 GHz 1.10 GHz
Package Size
Package Size
31.0mm x 24.0mm 42mm X 24mm
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
2.0 3.0
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
1 12

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel i5-3317U is a dual core, four thread, 3rd generation Ivy Bridge netbook and laptop processor. It launched in Q2 2012, and has since been succeeded by the i5-4200U which is a 4th generation Haswell (2013) processor. Comparing the 4200U and 3317U shows that, for 20% more money, the i5-4200U has a 10% faster effective speed and a 12% lower TDP. This is due to the newer and improved Haswell architecture. The TDP of 17 Watts should yield over 5 hours of battery life for average use. Like most mobile processors, the effective speed of 51.1 is poor, however, it's okay for handling the majority of day to day processing activities. The i5-3317U also has onboard HD Graphics 4000 which is sufficient for typical desktop use. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback