Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 830 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 830 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83B3
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220728
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 13 '22 at 17:52
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8350U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Memory 21
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 71.6
24% 43.6 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 255
24% 199 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 83B3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 0.2
3% 2.13 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 5.2
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4152012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 147 155 146 147 141 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.3% Below average
Read 185
Write 135
Mixed 175
SusWrite 149
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 10.5
33% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 149
116% 160 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 313
13% 313 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 830 G5 Builds (Compare 1,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 830 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback