IntelBX8071513400F
IntelBX80648I75820K

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.3GHz, Haswell-E.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 107,297 user samples
5,603 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 102% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 102% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 55th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
101,694 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 281st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
106 % Much faster effective speed.
+37%
76.8 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
83.6 Pts 86.4 Pts +3%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
186 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+93%
96.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
368 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+92%
192 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
682 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+87%
364 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1141 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+92%
594 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
90.5 Pts 94 Pts +4%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
192 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+60%
120 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
379 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+60%
237 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
700 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+52%
462 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1211 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+64%
737 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,778,647 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.69 % Hugely higher market share.
+229%
0.21 %
Value
Value For Money
120 % Better value.
+27%
94.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
90 % Much more popular.
+36%
66 %
Price
Price (score)
$175 $130 Cheaper.
+26%
Age
Newest
15 Months Hugely more recent.
+87%
116 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+54%
140 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
10 cores Much higher core count.
+67%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
10 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+55%
22 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
2.5 GHz 3.3 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+32%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.6 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+28%
3.6 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1658 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+78%
933 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1609 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+115%
748 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Raptor Lake Haswell-E
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1700 LGA2011-V3
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Raptor Lake Intel i5-13400F ($200 USD, cooler included) paired with a B660/B760 motherboard ($150 USD) and 2x8 GB DDR4 3600 RAM ($50 USD) offers good value for money to mid-range gamers. The 13400F has around 5% higher single-core and 35% higher multi-core performance than its predecessor. Although both processors feature the same Golden Cove p-cores, the 13400F has four additional energy efficient e-cores which account for the improvement in multi-core performance. The 13400F offers comparable gaming and better multi-core performance than AMD's 7600X but at a lower price and without the need for an aftermarket cooler, DDR5 memory and an expensive motherboard. Since Intel don’t care for long term relationships with PC hardware influencers, for product launches, they often end up sponsoring influencers that are mostly funded by AMD. As a result, Intel rarely get positive marketing coverage beyond launch, and their products remain relatively under priced compared to AMD. When paired with a DDR4 motherboard the 13100F/13400F CPUs (at MSRP) offer unbeatable/good value to entry/mid level PC gamers. High end gamers should investigate the 13600K, which thanks to both higher clocks and higher IPC (Raptor Cove), is around 15% faster than the 13400F. [Jan '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i7-5820K is the cheapest of three (5820K,5930K,5960X) new Haswell-E prosumer/enthusiast processors. The 5820K sports six physical cores and twelve threads which allow for enormous processing throughput. Unfortunately Intel have somewhat handicapped the 5820K by setting its base clock at just 3.3 GHz, 0.7GHz lower than the class leading 4790K. Comparing the 4790K and 5820K shows that the cheaper i7-4790K is significantly faster at both single and dual threaded workloads. The additional two cores found in the 5820K are not relevant to general computing and as such the 5820K probably makes a better server rather than consumer proposition. The Haswell-E X99 architecture also requires DDR4 RAM which is currently far more expensive than DDR3. Overall the 5820K is a very expensive option and probably best avoided by the vast majority of consumers.  [Sep '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback